Marcel and Heidegger on the Proper Matter and Manner of Thinking

By Engelland, Chad | Philosophy Today, Spring 2004 | Go to article overview

Marcel and Heidegger on the Proper Matter and Manner of Thinking


Engelland, Chad, Philosophy Today


Heidegger came to France for the first time in 1955, and was welcomed into the Chateau Cerisy-la-Salle where a certain number of philosophers and students had gathered in order to benefit from his presence.

-Gabriel Marcel

Our talk does not set itself the task of winding up a fixed program. But it would like to prepare all who are participating for a gathering in which what we call the Sein des Seienden appeals to us.

-Martin Heidegger to the 1955 gathering

In everyday usage, "mystery" often signifies that which is not known even if it is in principle knowable: "I don't know-it is a mystery to me." The "to me" indicates that it is in principle knowable even though as a matter of fact (purely accidentally) it is not known. We also speak of mystery novels or detective novels where the puzzle is to be solved. The inviolable nature of this genre is that the novel ends one page after the mystery has unraveled and thereby dissolved. What we speak of as mysterious is usually superficial, being based on a lack of genuine acquaintance: "He has such a mysterious character." Implied is that he is hiding something (a secret life, an affair, a career as a super hero) which revealed would do away with the mystery even if he would still remain "complex." In this, the "to me" is still implicitly attached; he is mysterious to me, though he is not in principle mysterious. Here, mystery is but the name for the unresolved problem. We can mention, in this regard, the television program "Unsolved Mysteries," which highlights crimes and phenomena that are in need of explanation and thus dissolution as mysteries: a "solved mystery" would be a poor mystery indeed.

Our survey of this network of usage has yet to bring us to an enduring mystery, a mystery that is in principle mysterious and not accidentally so.1 Such a mystery cannot be approached apart from a consideration of the manner of thought appropriate to it, for the matter of mystery calls forth a very particular manner of thinking and this manner of thinking is what first enables the matter to show itself for what it truly is: mysterious. (Manifesting mystery as mystery does not dissolve mystery into transparent lucidity.)2 In the last century, both Gabriel Marcel and Martin Heidegger labored to carve out the proper matter and manner of thinking.3 The proper matter insofar as they struggled to free for thinking the mystery of being, that which is most worthy of thought. The proper manner insofar as they struggled to articulate the specific character of a thinking that would be adequate to this mystery.4 To this end, both engaged in an ongoing polemic with modern technology and its dominant mode of thought: problem-solving (Marcel) or calculative reasoning (Heidegger). Both thinkers sought to free thinking from a representational mode of thinking and a technical mode of problem solving by turning to the positive mystery of being, to its in principle inexhaustible wondrousness-even if their understanding of that mystery differed greatly. Marcel, thinker of the person and the concrete, understands the domain of mystery as opened in interpersonal agape; Heidegger, thinker of Dasein and then Ereignis and Lichtung, understands the domain of mystery as opened by the free (though non-personal) appropriation of being. Marcel's mystery is mysterious because of its over-fullness and consequent impossibility of being given; Heidegger's mystery is mysterious because of its withdrawing negativity and consequent impossibility of being given. We then ask: Is this a lovers' quarrel over being in which both belong to the Same5 or is there rather an essential difference between them?

Marcel on Reflection and Mystery

Mystery as the Matter of Thought

Marcel first names the mystery of being in contradistinction to the problem of being in a journal entry from 22 October 1932.6 The mysterious, enlightened emergence of this fundamental distinction frees mystery from the domain of the problematical, liberating it for thought. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Marcel and Heidegger on the Proper Matter and Manner of Thinking
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Help
Full screen

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Style
    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    Buy instant access to save your work.

    Already a member? Log in now.

    Author Advanced search

    Oops!

    An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.