Research Methodologies in Science Education: Human Subjects and Education Research

By Libarkin, Julie C.; Kurdziel, Josepha P. | Journal of Geoscience Education, March 2004 | Go to article overview

Research Methodologies in Science Education: Human Subjects and Education Research


Libarkin, Julie C., Kurdziel, Josepha P., Journal of Geoscience Education


"the general rule is that if there is any element of research in an activity, that activity should undergo review for the protection of human subjects"

-from The Belmont Report

Maria and Alan, both geology professors at a large state university, are submitting a proposal to the National Science Foundation (NSF). They are planning to study the effect of web-based writing assignments on student learning. During the submission process, Maria notices that the cover page for proposals contains a checkbox labeled "Human Subjects". Alan thinks that they need to check the box, since they will be gathering data from students, although Maria thinks Human Subjects only refers to psychological or medical experiments involving people. Both Alan and Maria are concerned that their decision to check the "Human Subjects" box or leave it unchecked will impact their ability to receive federal funding.

DO "HUMAN SUBJECTS" GUIDELINES APPLY TO YOUR RESEARCH?

Although the use of the term "human subjects" has evolved in the last thirty years, today the phrase applies to any research that involves interaction with people. This includes not only medical studies, but also any type of social science research, including anthropology, ethnography, and education. Since 1974, federal guidelines nave dictated the procedures that must be followed for federally funded research that involves human subjects (Oakes, 2002). Additionally, most academic institutions have adopted these guidelines to cover any human research conducted by affiliated researchers, including projects with no private, state, or federal research funds. Penalties exist for researchers and institutions that do not follow these rules, with punishments ranging from simple reprimands to removal of all federal funding and cessation of research activities (Dunn and Chadwick, 2001). As a result, scientists are responsible for following all institutional and federal guidelines, and in most cases it is up to the researcher to obtain full human subjects approval before commencing any research that involves human participants.

Most institutions have an Institutional Review Board (IRB) that processes requests for research involving human subjects. In keeping with federal guidelines, many institutions, but not ail, make special allowances for research that involves educational settings, particularly where the research involves students anonymously completing tests or surveys. Most institutions still require completion of the human subjects review form, but approval is often expedited, meaning that the proposal is evaluated in a shorter time frame than is required for full IRB review. These are considered to be studies of "no-risk" or "low risk" to human participants (Figure 1). However, as soon as personal information pertaining to academic records is used, such as grades (even in aggregate), the stakes increase, and the required human subjects process becomes more complicated. Because academic information is considered to be private information, institutions must grant formal permission for the release of such information, particularly to the general public in the permanent form represented by most research publications.

PUTTING THE SUBJECT AHEAD OF THE RESEARCH

The use of human subjects in research is receiving more scrutiny today than ever before. This is due in large part to serious lapses in oversight that have resulted in repercussions to research subjects, ranging from annoyance to death. While the studies that have received the most attention are primarily in the medical field, all areas of human subjects research are now being held to a high standard, both by IRBs and the government's Office of Human Research Protections (OHRP). Although oversight boards have recognized for over thirty years that researchers cannot always be trusted to put the interests of research subjects ahead of the research itself, we are beginning to realize that the protections that are in place don t always work. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA 8, MLA 7, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Note: primary sources have slightly different requirements for citation. Please see these guidelines for more information.

Cited article

Research Methodologies in Science Education: Human Subjects and Education Research
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Help
Full screen
Items saved from this article
  • Highlights & Notes
  • Citations
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Style
    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA 8, MLA 7, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    Buy instant access to save your work.

    Already a member? Log in now.

    Search by... Author
    Show... All Results Primary Sources Peer-reviewed

    Oops!

    An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.