More with Less: Work Reorganization in the Canadian Mining Industry

By Aguiar, Luis L. M. | Capital & Class, Autumn 2000 | Go to article overview

More with Less: Work Reorganization in the Canadian Mining Industry


Aguiar, Luis L. M., Capital & Class


More with Less: Work Reorganization in the Canadian Mining Industry

University of Toronto Press, Toronto, 1999.

ISBN 0-8020-4354-2 (hbk) MO.00

ISBN 0-8020-8178-9 (pbk) 14.00

Two competing discourses have recently emerged within the labour process literature, each offering different interpretations and languages to explain the reorganization of work. One argues that changes in the workplace in the name of 'flexibility' benefit capital and further entrench the fordist organization of work leading to the intensification of work for the working class. The other accepts the transcendence of the fordist organization of work and argues that post-Fordism means 'empowering', and 'challenging' workers by re-combining conception and execution and validating their experiences and tacit knowledges of the organization of work. Moreover, a new and harmonious relationship between capital and labour is evident as each has something to gain in the new workplace. The postFordist workplace is a `win-win' political climate where cooperation between labour and capital has replaced confrontation. Where does Bob Russell locate himself in this literature? What evidence is there in the Canadian mining industry to support his own contribution to this paradigm?

Russell sets out to investigate the changing labour processes in the mining industry in Canada since the 1960s. At the same time, he empirically evaluates the post-industrial thesis that workplace change entails the introduction of more challenging and enskilling work leading to a workforce capable of diagnostic and analytical skills in the reorganized production process. Finally, Russell seeks to ascertain the extent to which new industrial relations protocols corresponds to the reorganization of work in the mining industry.

The book contains seven chapters. Chapter one reviews the literature on the (re)organization of work, provides a rationale for the study, and describes the methodological approaches used to collected data. Russell investigates four companies at five different sites with three, rather solidarity-lacking, unions representing workers. Site visits, surveys of mining and mill workers, interviews with union leaders and managers, and observations of union meetings discussing change in the workplace are the methods used. What surely must be an oversight, he forgets to inform the reader of the total number of interviews carried out.

Chapter two describes the market share of the Canadian Potash and Uranium industries, and the characteristics of their workforces. It is largely a (white) male workforce, with the exception of the crews at Key Lake in Northern Saskatchewan. Here, 37% of the workforce (147 of 399 workers) are Aboriginal. Women of Aboriginal descent are numerous here as well, and 13% of Russell's sample at this mine includes them. Typically, Aboriginals work in the mining department as heavy equipment operators (61% of them). In chapters three and four, Russell identifies two `cultures of employment'. By this he means the `specific strategies that are directed to managing workforces and influencing the work effort bargain' (p.28). Across the companies, two cultures of employment are identified-fordism and post-fordism. Chapter five evaluates the findings in chapters three and four with an eye to the literature. Chapter six examines the extent to which industrial relations protocols follow suite with the introduction of new work reorganization. The study is briefly concluded in chapter seven.

Russell begins his argument by stating that capital accumulation is primary and its achievement can take different forms in the capitalist organization of production. Thus, there is nothing inevitable about the choices management makes in securing profit, and by extension, it need not take specific form. More specifically, he concludes that the introduction and implementation of work reorganization is not due to arguments put forth by proponents of post-Fordism, (contradictions of fordism; concerns over monotony of work process; etc) but instead by managerial strategy of reducing workforce and making the remaining workforce do `more with less'. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

More with Less: Work Reorganization in the Canadian Mining Industry
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Help
Full screen

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Style
    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    Buy instant access to save your work.

    Already a member? Log in now.

    Author Advanced search

    Oops!

    An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.