Memory, Literacy, and Invention: Reimagining the Canon of Memory for the Writing Classroom

By Ryan, Kathleen J. | Composition Studies, Spring 2004 | Go to article overview

Memory, Literacy, and Invention: Reimagining the Canon of Memory for the Writing Classroom


Ryan, Kathleen J., Composition Studies


A few years ago, a colleague of mine, Alison, and I learned we shared a belief in the potential for students to use memory to compose personal essays and to view themselves as meaning makers. We met a few times to talk informally about teaching writing and the canon of memory, and I observed class meetings where Alison tried to bring attention to memory in the context of a personal essay assignment. An example of what I identify as a problem of definition took place when I observed Alison's students discuss the following prompt in response to Patricia Hampl's essay "Memory and Imagination:" "For Patricia Hampl, 'writing memoir is not a form of transcription.' What does the author mean by that?" This classroom activity was intended to expand the ways students used memory to compose a personal essay. Listening in on the discussion, I heard students say "memoir is not word for word" and that the writer "adds what one wants to get what they want to have happen." A student in a Detroit baseball cap added that she learned in psychology class that "there is no such thing as memory triggers" and a young man in a red shirt pointed out that "eyewitness memory is fallible. It is not just like a recording." Comments like these developed a conversation about memoir writing as more than a matter of recording stored memories on paper. However, when composing their own essays, these students returned to more limited notions of memory. Alison's students struggled with memory, invention, and genre because they tried to recapture exact memories and report them in chronological order.

Despite the students' insights about the role of imagination and invention in response to Hampl's essay on memoir, it became clear that they continued to equate memory with memorization and transcription when it came to their own writing in their composition class. They needed more sustained discussion of the differences among memory, memorization, and memoir than we could offer at that time. To redefine memory as a strategic, contextualized process of interpretation requires a new version of classical rhetoric's fourth canon, memoria. A contemporary canon of memory that I call rememoried knowing attends to the relationships among history, literacy, and invention to reconceive memory as a way to make knowledge.

HISTORY, LITERACY, AND INVENTION: RETHINKING TREATMENTS OK THE CANON OF MEMORY

Edward P. J. Corbett's deliberate neglect of rhetorical memory in his well-known text Classical Rhetoric for the Modern Student exemplifies the typical response to rhetorical memory as uninteresting, particularly for a literate society:

of all the five parts of rhetoric, memoria was the one that received the least attention in the rhetoric books. The reason for the neglect of this aspect of rhetoric is probably that not much can be said, in a theoretical way, about the process of memory; and after rhetoric came to be concerned mainly with written discourse, there was no further need to deal with memorizing. (38)

Despite recent recovery work such as Frederick Reynolds's collection Rhetorical Memory and Delivery, Corbett's idea that "not much can be said" about the canon of memory still needs to be challenged. The assumption that using memory means memorizing remains common and reflects a narrow perspective on the canon's history and outmoded beliefs about literacy and invention.

The description of the artificial art of memory in Rhetorica ad Herennium, the oldest surviving rhetoric manual, is one often used to define the art of memory.1 According to this text, the art of memory involves placing different images in standard backgrounds. An orator chooses images based on points of an argument or facts of a case that need to be remembered and relies on a stock set of architectural spaces, like a house or intercolumnar space, to serve as backgrounds. Speakers "imprint," or mentally place, images in the backgrounds to "easily succeed in calling back to mind what we wish" (Rhetorica ad Herennium 3. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Memory, Literacy, and Invention: Reimagining the Canon of Memory for the Writing Classroom
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Help
Full screen

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Style
    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    Buy instant access to save your work.

    Already a member? Log in now.

    Author Advanced search

    Oops!

    An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.