Election 2000 and U.S.-Israel Relations

By DeLee, Debra | Tikkun, January/February 2001 | Go to article overview

Election 2000 and U.S.-Israel Relations


DeLee, Debra, Tikkun


Election 2000 and U.S.-Israel Relations

Debra DeLee is president and CEO of Americans for Peace Now.

As I write, we still don't know who will be the next president of the United States, nor do we know the final composition of the 107th Congress. But even before the dust settles, the one thing we do know is that the challenge for progressive forces in Israel and in the American Jewish community will be to familiarize ourselves with the new players in Washington and to educate them about the complexities of life in the Middle East.

The next administration and Congress will need to learn that a majority of Israelis still support the peace process, even during times of trouble. Polls show that up to 66 percent of Israelis favor continuing the peace process with the Palestinians, compared with 31 percent who do not and 3 percent who don't know. Further, surveys indicate that 59 percent of Israelis would either vote for, or are leaning towards voting for, a final status agreement between Israel and the Palestinians based on what they have heard until now, while 32 percent would vote against it or are leaning towards voting against it, and 9 percent don't know. Some American Jewish groups have walked away from the peace process, but U.S. decision-makers must be told that the Israeli people have not.

The next administration and Congress will need to learn that Israelis support peace because they are pragmatists who recognize that the only alternative is ongoing rioting, violence, and destruction. Some groups in our community point to renewed hostilities as proof that the peace process failed. But the exact opposite is true. The recent turmoil underscores the failure of prolonged stalemate and what can fill the vacuum in the absence of peace. Israelis already know this, but Washington must be made to understand that peace is the only acceptable response to what is taking place in the region.

The next administration and Congress will need to learn that peace is in the best interests of Israel because it provides the Jewish State with greater international acceptance, foreign investment, economic growth, and stability. The peace process was the reason that Israeli high-tech companies had an environment that encouraged their phenomenal growth, that the tourist industry was booming, that moderate Arab states were willing to establish diplomatic relations, and that the Israeli standard of living had risen to Western European levels.

And the next administration and Congress will need to learn that peace serves American interests as well. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Election 2000 and U.S.-Israel Relations
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Help
Full screen

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Style
    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    Buy instant access to save your work.

    Already a member? Log in now.

    Oops!

    An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.