ERISA: Fiduciary Decisions in ERISA Subject to Abuse of Discretion Review-Booth V. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc

By Willgoos, Christine | American Journal of Law & Medicine, January 1, 2000 | Go to article overview

ERISA: Fiduciary Decisions in ERISA Subject to Abuse of Discretion Review-Booth V. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc


Willgoos, Christine, American Journal of Law & Medicine


ERISA: Fiduciary Decisions in ERISA Subject to Abuse of Discretion Review-- Booth v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.1-The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit held that abuse of discretion, not arbitrary and capricious, was the appropriate standard of review for a fiduciary's discretionary decision of an employee welfare benefit plan regulated by the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA).2 The court clarified the abuse of discretion standard by articulating relevant factors to be considered in determining whether a fiduciary had abused its discretion.3

Barbara Booth, an employee of Wal-Mart Stores, enrolled in its self-funded employee benefit plan (the Plan). Four months after subscribing to the Plan, she sought reimbursement for a coronary angioplasty and related medical treatment. Booth's claims were denied under the pre-existing condition exclusion because of evidence of coronary heart disease. Booth appealed the decision to the Plan's Administrative Committee. After a review of Booth's file, which included statements by Booth's physicians as well as medical reviews by two physicians selected by Plan administrators, the Administrative Committee denied reimbursement of the benefits at issue. Booth brought this action in Virginia state court to recover benefits under section 502(a)(1)(B) of ERISA. Wal-Mart removed the case to federal court. At a bench trial, the district court held that the Plan had abused its discretion by denying Booth's claims, and remanded to the Plan's Administrative Committee for reconsideration.4

On appeal, the Fourth Circuit noted that there was ambiguity within the circuit as to whether the appropriate standard of review for a fiduciary's discretionary decision was arbitrary and capricious or abuse of discretion.5 The court recognized that the arbitrary and capricious standard was more deferential to the fiduciary than the abuse of discretion standard. The court held that, under ERISA, abuse of discretion was the appropriate standard of review for a discretionary decision by a plan or adminstrator.6 The court stated that under the abuse of discretion standard, a court should not disturb a fiduciary's discretionary decision provided it is reasonable.7

The Fourth Circuit articulated eight factors that a court may consider, but is not limited to, in determining the reasonableness of a decision:

(1) the language of the plan; (2) the purposes and goals of the plan; (3) the adequacy of the materials considered to make the decision and the degree to which they support it; (4) whether the fiduciary's interpretation was consistent with other provisions in the plan and with earlier interpretations of the plan; (5) whether the decision-making process was reasonable and principled; (6) whether the decision was consistent with the procedural and substantive requirements of ERISA; (7) any external standard relevant to the exercise of discretion; and (8) the fiduciary's motives and any conflict of interest it may have. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

ERISA: Fiduciary Decisions in ERISA Subject to Abuse of Discretion Review-Booth V. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Help
Full screen

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Style
    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    Buy instant access to save your work.

    Already a member? Log in now.

    Author Advanced search

    Oops!

    An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.