Liability of Media Companies for the Violent Content of Their Products Marketed to Children

By Proman, Jonathan M. | St. John's Law Review, Spring 2004 | Go to article overview

Liability of Media Companies for the Violent Content of Their Products Marketed to Children


Proman, Jonathan M., St. John's Law Review


INTRODUCTION

Children in the United States are frequently exposed to media violence, defined for the purposes of this Note as communication depicting physical force used to injure person or property.1 Courts have refused to hold media corporations liable for the violent content of child-entertainment products,2 but many legal commentators have argued for an expansion of the law.3 This Note examines the circumstances under which media corporations may be civilly liable for the violent content of their youth-oriented products. Specifically, this Note will examine negligence suits and First Amendment protections. It will explore whether the expansion of the law, such as presumption of a causal link between media violence and aggressive behavior in children, is necessary. It will also look at whether the health and safety of children is a compelling interest that mitigates First Amendment protections. Finally, this Note will consider whether retaining current law is preferable absent scientific proof that media violence leads to aggressive behavior in children.

This Note suggests that courts in media-violence suits have not considered the Supreme Court's decision in Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.11 and that, despite scientific uncertainty regarding causal links between media violence and aggressive behavior in children, Daubert is not an absolute bar to expert testimony. Finally, this Note proposes that the health and safety of children is a compelling interest that should limit media companies' First Amendment freedom to market violent products to adolescents for pecuniary gain.

I. CAN VIOLENT MEDIA PRODUCTS LEAD TO VIOLENT BEHAVIOR IN CHILDREN?

Negligence claims hinge on whether plaintiffs can prove that media violence leads to violent behavior in children.5 Since the early 1960s, some scientists have argued that such a causal connection exists.6 Repetition of clinical and empirical studies cited by legal scholars continues to substantiate the hypothesis that media violence, including television, video games, and music, leads to aggressive behavior in children.7 Thus, there is scientific support that violent media products lead to violence among children. Video games have received particular attention, where evidence of such causal links is especially strong.8

Nonetheless, some studies reach contrary results and conclude that, absent preexisting psychological abnormalities, media violence neither desensitizes children to real life violence nor leads to violent behavior.9 According to these studies, the effects of motion pictures,10 video games,11 or other media products on children is negligible.12 Thus, violent media products pose no risk to child consumers.

Hypothesized links between media violence and violent behavior in children remain speculative or, in the opinion of one researcher, "pitifully underwhelming."13 The issue continues to generate debate within the scientific community, and a consensus has yet to be reached.14 Parents, religious groups, and educators express concern that media violence may be unhealthy for children.15 Furthermore, popular literature voices the concerns of many laypersons that media violence is a negative influence on children.16

II. MEDIA COMPANIES HAVE NOT BEEN held LIABLE FOR THE VIOLENT CONTENT OF THEIR PRODUCTS

Although scientists are divided, courts have decided the causation issue in favor of the media industry,17 and violent media products have received broad First Amendment protections.18 As a result, plaintiffs in media-violence suits are nearly foreclosed from presenting a genuine issue of material fact regarding causation because, even if the First Amendment does not bar suit, courts have concluded that media violence cannot, under virtually any circumstances, lead to violent behavior in children.19 Therefore, media companies are held to owe no duty to third parties injured by youths under the influence of violent media products. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Liability of Media Companies for the Violent Content of Their Products Marketed to Children
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Help
Full screen

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Style
    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    Buy instant access to save your work.

    Already a member? Log in now.

    Author Advanced search

    Oops!

    An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.