Filing of Amicus Curiae Briefs in State Courts of Last Resort: 1960-2000

By Corbally, Sarah F.; Bross, Donald C. et al. | Justice System Journal, January 1, 2004 | Go to article overview

Filing of Amicus Curiae Briefs in State Courts of Last Resort: 1960-2000


Corbally, Sarah F., Bross, Donald C., Flango, Victor E., Justice System Journal


This study examines the use of amicus curiae briefs in state courts of last resort. Key findings are that use of amicus varies greatly among states, with the majority of filings occurring in a small number of states. The hypothesis that restrictiveness of court rules may impact the filing of amicus briefs was tested, but not confirmed, leading to speculation that extensive filing of amicus briefs may lead to more restrictive court rules. Amicus briefs were most often used in tort and criminal cases. Finally, the courts' willingness to acknowledge, cite, and solicit amicus briefs was explored as a possible indicator of their influence. Amici were acknowledged in at least a third of the cases, and arguments made in the briefs were discussed in 82 percent of the sample cases.

Under the separation of powers, courts have always been insulated from public pressure common to the "political" branches under the rationale that ours is a government of laws not men. Courts must use legal reasoning to interpret the law and should not be influenced by public opinion. Indeed, "elaborate procedures have been established to deny groups access to the judiciary and to exclude from the judicial forum all information except that which is presented to them by the lawyers within the courtroom" (Peltason, 1955:28). Parties with a grievance and "standing to sue" can initiate judicial proceedings. The NAACP, for example, chose to use the courts to achieve their objectives in the Restrictive Covenant cases rather than to lobby Congress or the executive branch agencies (Vose, 1959).1 Unless they are parties to a suit, interest groups gain access to the judiciary much less directly than to either the legislative or executive branches.2 In states that select judges by popular election, the public is invited to participate in the process by which those who make decisions are chosen. Otherwise, access to courts is available by sponsoring test cases, by trying to influence judicial opinion through articles in law reviews, and ultimately by trying to change the laws or statutes upon which courts rely to interpret law.

Another important and legitimate way that the public and organized groups can influence the development of law is though the use of amicus curiae briefs.3 In recent times, filing of these briefs has been the most popular method of influencing judicial policymaking.4 These "friend of the court" briefs may provide legal support to one or the other parties to the suit or may supply useful information that neither party included in their briefs. Either through permission of the parties themselves or permission of the court, groups can present their arguments even if they are not parties to the suit. Obviously, parties are most likely to grant permission to groups to file amicus briefs if they endorse the leading arguments of the parties. Filing amicus briefs allows groups to demonstrate their activity and effectiveness and, thus, may help attract new members. As O'Connor and McFaIl (1992:271) state: "A group has to be able to show its members that their efforts are paying off, and filing amicus briefs is the easiest way to do that."

AMICUS BRIEFS IN THE U.S. SUPREME COURT AND STATE COURTS OF LAST RESORT

Amicus Briefs in the U.S. Supreme Court

The first studies of amicus briefs were case studies of interest group activity in the U.S. Supreme Court.

Forty years ago, in "The Amicus Curiae Brief: From Friendship to Advocacy," Krislov summarized the development of amicus practice from Roman times to 1963. He noted that amicus participation is very likely in important legal controversies. "Where the stakes are highest for the groups, and where the needs on the part of the judges for information and for sharing of responsibility through consultation are at a peak, access has appropriately, and almost inevitably, been at its greatest" (Krislov, 1963:703-04). he further asserts that the U.S. the Supreme Court "has helped foster (the) development (of amicus curiae) as a vehicle for broad representation of interests, particularly in disputes where political ramifications are wider than a narrow view of common law litigation might indicate" (Krislov, 1963:720). …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Filing of Amicus Curiae Briefs in State Courts of Last Resort: 1960-2000
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Help
Full screen

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Style
    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    Buy instant access to save your work.

    Already a member? Log in now.

    Oops!

    An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.