Exploring Technological Organization and Burial Practices at the Paleoindian Gordon Creek Site (5LR99), Colorado

By Muniz, Mark P. | Plains Anthropologist, August 2004 | Go to article overview

Exploring Technological Organization and Burial Practices at the Paleoindian Gordon Creek Site (5LR99), Colorado


Muniz, Mark P., Plains Anthropologist


ABSTRACT

The goals of this article are to present the results of a new radiocarbon date and lithic analyses conducted on the artifacts interred with the Gordon Creek burial (5LR99) located in the Front Range foothills of northern Colorado. An AMS assay returned a date of 9650 ± 50 B.P. (NSRL-13179, CURL-6724; carbonized sap; [delta]^sup 13^C = -19.7[per thousand]). Reduction strategies and morphology were examined for two of the bifaces (13652.a and 13652.d) accompanying the burial. The results suggest possible long-term continuity in biface manufacture strategies throughout the Paleoindian period, as well as an affiliation with the Hell Gap Cultural Complex for the Gordon Creek burial itself. Results of high-magnification microwear analysis suggest that some of the lithic tools may have been manufactured for the burial event and highlight the need for additional microwear analyses to be conducted with other Paleoindian lithic tool assemblages. Finally, an examination of the burial goods indicates a possible emic distinction in how different material culture classes were treated at death by Hell Gap peoples.

Keywords: Paleoindian, burial, microwear, lithic reduction

The overall goals of this research are to refine the radiocarbon age of the Gordon Creek burial (5LR99) site and explore the technological organization of the people responsible for the site along the lines of biface production strategies and usewear. Gordon Creek is the only known Paleoindian-aged burial from the High Plains or Front Range of Colorado and Wyoming (Figure 1). Although the Hourglass Cave burial was discovered in the Southern Rocky Mountains of Colorado, its late radiocarbon age ranging from 7700 to 8100 uncalibrated B.R (Hall 1997) is considerably younger than Gordon Creek and aligns it closer to Early Archaic cultures. Analyses of the Ourdou Creek skeletal remains, artifacts, and burial pit were originally published over thirty years ago (Anderson 1966; Breternitz et al. 1971; Gillio 1970) and since that time new analytical techniques have been developed that offer the opportunity to refine what is currently known about the site.

A pooled carbon sample was gathered from a small intact block of sediment that was collected during the original excavation from the base of the burial pit. The type of carbon dated, the tight spatial clustering of the sample, and the use of the AMS dating technique result in a reliable date that has a small margin of error and can be averaged with two pre-existing dates from the site. In addition to recording metric attributes, the production strategies for two bifaces (13652.a, 13652.d) included in the burial were analyzed by mapping the sequence of flake removals based on overlapping flake scar patterns preserved on their surfaces. These data were then combined with observations of flake scar type and the overall morphology of the bifaces and compared to other known Paleoindian biface production strategies. This analysis provides two important results. First, the production strategy and shape of the smaller biface (13652.d) conforms closely with production strategies and the basic morphology of Hell Gap projectile points. second, the production strategy and morphology of the large biface (13652.a) conforms closely with the overall morphology and techniques used to make large Clovis bifacial cores, such as those recovered from the Fenn cache (Frison and Bradley 9 1999; Wilke 2002). Usewear analysis of the microcrystalline tools and single "smooth stone" from the site provides data on patterns of use for a variety of tool classes that were grouped as a burial assemblage. The results of the microwear analysis indicate that the tools were interred in the grave at the beginning of their active use-lives and highlight the need for additional microwear analyses to be conducted on other lithic assemblages of comparable age. Finally, a comparison of the treatment of the various burial items suggests an apparent symbolic duality that may have had emic importance to the group responsible for the site. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • A full archive of books and articles related to this one
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Exploring Technological Organization and Burial Practices at the Paleoindian Gordon Creek Site (5LR99), Colorado
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Help
Full screen

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Style
    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

    Already a member? Log in now.