Government's Role in the Private Sector: The Case against Reregulating Cable Television

By Bigger, Mark; Ghazanfar, S. M. | The Journal of Social, Political, and Economic Studies, Summer 1995 | Go to article overview

Government's Role in the Private Sector: The Case against Reregulating Cable Television


Bigger, Mark, Ghazanfar, S. M., The Journal of Social, Political, and Economic Studies


The cable television industry has become one of the most controversial services in the U.S. economy. Consumers typically have two basic complaints about this service: poor quality and high rates. During the 1980s' Reagan era, cable television was among many industries that were deregulated. It has been argued that during deregulation consumer welfare was not maximized and that the industry enjoyed an unfair advantage. In response, Congress has moved toward reregulating the industry. The central issue in this move is what the effects of reregulation will be on both the consumer and the cable television industry. Some argue that reregulation would actually raise the subscription cost to the consumer and do nothing to stop the virtual monopoly that exists. Proponents of reregulation obviously disagree, leaving one to wonder what will actually happen in the future with regard to both price and service. This paper argues that reregulation is not the answer and that greater competition must be encouraged in the cable television industry. After a brief synopsis of the current U.S. cable industry, the recent record of regulation and deregulation will be summarized. Then it will be argued that greater competition is the solution to improving cable television services. This will be followed by some discussion of how greater competition may be encouraged, and why eventually it is unavoidable.

The Cable Industry

Currently, there are more than 11,000 cable systems in the U.S. (Corn-Revere, 81). Nearly 95% of households have access and about 57% subscribe (Benoit, 37). The service varies widely, with an average of about 36 channels provided, but with the potential to double within the next few years. The industry was deregulated in 1984; and according to lawmakers, complaints by consumers have led them to reregulate the industry. But according to a survey of readers conducted by Consumer Reports, before the push toward reregulation, three-quarters of those polled said they were either very or fairly satisfied wit their cable systems (Coy, 58). Nevertheless, consumers also stated by a three to one margin that they would like to see "another cable company come in and compete" in their area. By the same margin, however, readers agreed that cable is a "utility" and "should be regulated accordingly" (Consumer Reports, 584).

At this point in time, there is little competition for most of the existing cable systems, besides broadcast television. Cable has had no problem conquering "free" broadcast television, for obvious reasons-the main one being the sheer number of choices available. Only about 50 cable systems operate with traditional head-to-head competition. Rates between competing cable systems are often as much as 20 percent lower than for those in communities with only one cable system, and per channel charges can be as much as 50 percent lower. The average number of channels in such communities is the same (about 36), but local authorities typically view the wiring of communities for two cable systems as impractical and grant exclusive contracts to only one system, effectively snuffing out competition before it can start to do its work of improved efficiency. In addition, these cable systems also often buy out the competition or wage court battles to retain exclusive franchises. In 1990, nearly 50% of the cable television market was controlled by the four largest cable corporations. Only once between 1984 (deregulation) and September 1991 has a city been able to oust its cable system (Consumer Reports, 583-584). It is important to note here that there is little evidence to support the claim by the cable industry that cable television is a natural monopoly, meaning that having one system is cheaper to build and operate than having competing systems serving the same area (Evans, 26).

At the same time, however, we observe that cable rates have risen dramatically. Between 1986 and 1991, the government's cable television index rose 53. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Government's Role in the Private Sector: The Case against Reregulating Cable Television
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Help
Full screen

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Style
    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    Buy instant access to save your work.

    Already a member? Log in now.

    Oops!

    An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.