Progress, Unity, and Democracy: Dissolving Political Parties in Turkey

By Kogacioglu, Dicle | Law & Society Review, September 2004 | Go to article overview

Progress, Unity, and Democracy: Dissolving Political Parties in Turkey


Kogacioglu, Dicle, Law & Society Review


In this article, I analyze two cases where the Turkish Constitutional Court dissolved political parties during the 1990s. Specifically, I examine the cases against the Islamist Refah (Welfare/Well-Being) Party and the pro-Kurdish Halkin Emek Partisi (People's Labor Party). While the former was charged with threatening the secular basis of the national social order, the charges against the latter were around its allegedly separatist character. I engage in an in-depth analysis of the lines of argument in the indictments, arguments of defense deployed by the parties, and their ultimate contestations as they appeared in the final decisions by the Court. I see the Court as engaging with a medley of themes and tendencies, [trying to resolve them for the case at hand]. I argue that despite the differences in the construction of the alleged threats, in both cases the Court deployed a similar image of the ways in which social, political, and judicial terrains interact. A rather arbitrary boundary between the political and cultural domains informs these decisions. The Court operates with the understanding that once this boundary is transgressed, what may be harmless when an issue is cultural-such as the use of the headscarf or of the Kurdish language-may turn into a political symbol threatening the basis of the united, democratic, and progressive nation-state. In this vision, the concepts of democracy, progress, and unity are intimately tied together such that the threat to one of these concepts almost simultaneously constitutes a threat to the other two. The Court imagines itself as protecting the boundary between the political and cultural domains in an effort to uphold the right of a democracy to protect itself. This line of thought also enables the court's rather routine involvement in the political domain-which has brought about eighteen decisions for political party dissolution since 1980.

Introduction

In recent years, constitutionalism as a mode of political action undertaken by courts and other political entities has become key to efforts toward political reconstruction. In both South Africa and Eastern Europe, for example, constitutionalism has become the modus operandi of setting the framework of new political orders, for coming to terms with a troublesome past, and for gaining political legitimacy vis-à-vis relevant global or regional transnational institutions (Klug 2000; Scheppele 1999; Arjomand 1992). At the same time, constitutions today, as in the past, remain a crucial arena for contesting and negotiating the boundaries of the legitimate order and work as a juridico-political site for affirming and performing deeply rooted imaginations of a nation's past, present, and future.1 Constitutional courts, accordingly, emerge as major players in these contestations (Scheppele 2003b; Stone Sweet 1992).

Studies of constitutional courts focus on judicial review and on the impact of constitutional decisions on the legislative process (Stone Sweet 1992; Arjomand 1992; Scheppele 2003b). The Turkish Constitutional Court has been studied along these lines as well (Shambayati 2002; Hazama 1996). However, relatively little attention has been given to the role of constitutional courts in actively structuring the boundaries of the legitimate political domain through their power to dissolve political parties on constitutional grounds (Dobson 2003; Genckaya 1998; Peled 1992; Shambayati 2002). While dissolutions in general are thought to be exceptional in "consolidated democracies," especially in Western Europe, recent developments such as the ban on Batasuna, the Basque Party in Spain,2 and the German Constitutional Court's rejection of banning the neo-Nazi National Democratic Party point to the pertinence of studies on this capacity of constitutional courts. In this article, I engage in such a study by analyzing two instances in which Turkey's Constitutional Court dissolved political parties that were represented in the parliament during the 1990s. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Progress, Unity, and Democracy: Dissolving Political Parties in Turkey
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Help
Full screen

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Style
    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    Buy instant access to save your work.

    Already a member? Log in now.

    Author Advanced search

    Oops!

    An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.