Facilitating Scientific Research: Intellectual Property Rights and the Norms of Science-A Response to Rai and Eisenberg

By Kieff, F. Scott | Northwestern University Law Review, Winter 2001 | Go to article overview

Facilitating Scientific Research: Intellectual Property Rights and the Norms of Science-A Response to Rai and Eisenberg


Kieff, F. Scott, Northwestern University Law Review


Forum

I. INTRODUCTION

Arti Rai's article in the Fall 1999 issue of the Northwestern University Law Review explores the proper use of both legal rules and prescriptive norms to shape behavior in the basic biological research community., Rai's article builds upon the extensive work in this area by Rebecca Eisenberg, which first attained prominence through Eisenberg's article in the December 1987 issue of the Yale Law Journal.2 Eisenberg concludes that the use of patents in the area of basic biological research may frustrate central norms of the community.3 Rai prescribes concerted public and private action as the best tools for avoiding patents and the problems Eisenberg attributes to them.4 This Essay responds to patent critics like Rai and Eisenberg by showing how patents are essential for promoting the central norms of the basic biological research community.

Rai begins her argument by painting a portrait of the basic biological research community before 1980 as a benchmark against which to measure the relative performance of that same community today. She analyzes the traditional prescriptive norms of the earlier community and argues that they "discouraged property rights in scientific invention and discovery."5 Against this benchmark, she criticizes the shift in the statutory and case law around 1980 that increased availability of patents in this community.6 According to Rai, this legal change triggered a cascade of selfish behavior among those in the community that caused a significant erosion of the community's central norms, replacing them instead with property interests.7 Rai then provides an economic analysis to justify her argument that patents should be avoided in this community.8 In the end, Rai recommends the creation and implementation of new laws and prescriptive norms to avoid patents and the problems they purportedly cause for the basic biological research community.9

There are several problems with Rai's argument. First, Rai mischaracterizes the pre-1980 basic biological research community. The community's norms did not discourage intellectual property before 1980, or thereafter. Furthermore, her portrait does not account for the pernicious, selfish behavior that existed in this highly competitive and stratified community before 1980 and that persists today. In addition, Rai misinterprets the operation and design of the patent system. The shift in applicable patent law that took place around 1980 brought the system in line with non-native legal theory and design. The shift marks a positive change because patents are essential for bringing needed resources to the community. This infusion of resources has two output-expanding effects on community performance. Some increased output is due simply to increased input. Some is due to improved efficiency. The added resources brought by patents can operate as important tools for overcoming the frustration of the community's prescriptive norms that would otherwise be caused by selfish behavior. Therefore, the use of patents in the basic biological research community should be encouraged.

II. SETTING A PROPER BENCHMARK

The norms of the basic biological research community that are the focus of arguments by patent critics like Rai and Eisenberg are termed "prescriptive norms," or "normative norms."10 These are "socially inculcated beliefs within the research science community about how scientists should behave, as opposed to descriptions of how they actually do behave."" These prescriptive norms of the basic biological research community closely track the traditional prescriptive norms of basic science as they are generally explored in the works of sociologists Barnard Barber, Warren Hagstrom, and Robert Merton.12 Eisenberg focuses on the following four interrelated prescriptive norms: universalism, communism, disinterestedness, and organized skepticism.13 Universalism means that the veracity of claimed scientific observations should be determined by universal criteria without regard to the particular attributes of the claimant, such as reputation, institutional affiliation, or nationality. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • A full archive of books and articles related to this one
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Facilitating Scientific Research: Intellectual Property Rights and the Norms of Science-A Response to Rai and Eisenberg
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Help
Full screen

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Style
    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

    Already a member? Log in now.