Awards Energize a Suggestion Program

By Steele, Rosalie A. | Personnel Journal, October 1992 | Go to article overview

Awards Energize a Suggestion Program

Steele, Rosalie A., Personnel Journal

During the first six months of 1987, a suggestion box for accounts-receivable employees in the Internal Medicine Business Office of Washington University School of Medicine contained only one employee idea. It was an anonymous complaint.

Administrators recognized that there was a need for improved problem identification and resolution. They also acknowledged that employees who performed hands-on work were equipped best to identify problems and offer workable solutions. After careful analysis, the office began a formal employee suggestion program in October 1987.

Today, the suggestion program has grown from a fledgling effort to a dynamic suggestion process. Seventy employees are eligible. Of those, 82% submit suggestions, 65% of which are adopted. In 1991, each eligible employee submitted an average of 2.78 ideas. The results during the first quarter of 1992 were double those of the previous year. These statistics far exceed national averages for suggestion programs. (See chart on page 98). (Chart omitted)

Designed to inspire improvement. SMART(Sensible Management and Accounts Receivable Techniques) is a successful yet inexpensively administered employee suggestion process nearing its fifth year of operation. It was designed to inspire accounts-receivable employees to submit suggestions that could increase income, improve productivity, eliminate duplication of effort, save time or money, identify problems, or result in other office improvements.

All office employees to the level of assistant supervisor are eligible to participate. Supervisors and managers are ineligible because they vote for winners, and because innovation is expected from people in those positions. Supervisors also motivate their employees to identify problems, develop solutions and consider the benefits to the office.

The SMART process is quite simple. Using an entry form, an employee summarizes the identified problem, solution and benefits. The employee then gives the entry to the area supervisor for review. The supervisor, in turn, brings the entry to the special projects administrator, who records the idea, appraises it for clarity, and thanks the employee. The entry becomes blind at that point to eliminate possible voter bias in judging the merit of the idea.

The focus of the process is on creative problem resolution. Even when employees submit ideas that cannot be implemented, areas needing improvement become evident, and ways to address issues may be offered by others. The only time ideas are rejected at the outset is when the same suggestion has been made during the preceding 12 months. This limitation is enforced to encourage employees to address new problems as they occur.

Supervisors present suggestions from their area at a monthly SMART Committee Meeting. The committee includes all business office managers and supervisors. They review each suggestion, determine whether it should be implemented, discuss alternate solutions, and judge its impact on the bottom line. The committee selects first-and second-place winners, which are based on the perceived impact of the idea on the office. Winners' names remain anonymous until the next monthly results meeting.

All entrants are recognized at the results meeting, and those who have presented ideas that can be adopted receive gifts. The first place winner receives $75, a humorous prize and the coveted SMART Award (a specially-designed trophy with a magic self-illuminating light bulb. The second-place winner receives $50 and a humorous gift. Other employees whose ideas will be implemented receive free-lunch certificates. Entrants who submitted suggestions that can't be implemented receive honorable mention.

Success depends on several factors. The process itself is only the skeleton of a successful program. In practice, what makes SMART work are:

* Full administrative support

* An ongoing emphasis on the benefits of participation

* Sensitivity to employee motivational triggers

* Memorable awards

* Thorough tracking mechanisms

* Focus on the bottom line. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • A full archive of books and articles related to this one
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Cite this article

Cited article

Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)


1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25,

Cited article

Awards Energize a Suggestion Program


Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25,

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

    Already a member? Log in now.