Comparing Aspects of Mental Health Legislation of Israel and Massachusetts

By Mester, Roberto; Pinals, Debra | The Israel Journal of Psychiatry and Related Sciences, January 1, 2004 | Go to article overview

Comparing Aspects of Mental Health Legislation of Israel and Massachusetts


Mester, Roberto, Pinals, Debra, The Israel Journal of Psychiatry and Related Sciences


Abstract: This paper compares the manner in which two sets of mental health laws, that of Massachusetts, U.S.A., and that of the State of Israel, deal with specific areas of civil enforced commitment. The definition of psychiatric disorder that justifies commitment is broader in Massachusetts, in Israel psychosis alone is considered, excluding conditions such as severe non-psychotic depression, obsessive-compulsive disorder and anorexia. In Israel, commitment is possible only when there is a risk of danger that is immediate. In Massachusetts, only a judge can make decisions beyond the first four days, while in Israel they are made by a District Psychiatrist. Unlike Massachusetts, there is no possibility of enforced commitment of alcoholics or drug addicts in Israel, even in the presence of impaired judgement and severe family distress. The changing trends are presented, as Israel seems to be drawing slowly toward the Massachusetts position in some of these issues. The role of consumers in these processes is considered, as is the possibility of enforced commitment of people with severe personality disorders.

Introduction

Mental health laws of different countries, as any other laws, are the result of the interaction of various vectors such as: 1. the sociological characteristics of the nation (e.g., tradition of democracy, level of respect for human life and citizen rights, cultural attitudes towards the mentally ill); 2. level of development of medical services and their availability; 3. the geography and size of the country; 4. the function and success of the economy.

The United States and Israel are both solid and stable democracies with a high respect for human rights. They differ in that the former has a large population, legislation which is often different from state to state, a constitution and a large and rich economy. Moreover, states within the U.S.A., including Massachusetts, have an expanding interest in the development of close and flexible collaboration between the psychiatric establishment and the legal system. Massachusetts, also called the Spirit of America and one of the oldest states of North America, has been the cradle of the process that led to the creation of the country, its constitution and other major historical developments, such as the abolition of slavery and the struggle to preserve the Union. It possesses highly sophisticated mental health laws.

The specific focus of this paper will be a comparison between the approaches of the Massachusetts and the Israel mental health legislation to some issues of importance such as: their definition of mental illness, consent to hospitalization and to treatment, reviewing procedures, involuntary civil commitment in general and commitment of substance abusers in particular.

The Definitions of Mental Illness and Their Relation to Involuntary Commitment

The Massachusetts Department of Mental Health's definition of the psychiatric condition which justifies involuntary civil commitment appears in section 3.01 of Chapter 104 of the Code of Massachusetts Regulations (M.G.L.c. 123, s.2) and states: "For the purpose of involuntary commitment ...'mental illness' shall mean a substantial disorder of thought, mood, perception, orientation or memory which grossly impairs judgement, behavior, capacity to recognize reality or ability to meet the ordinary demands of the life but shall not include alcoholism..." (1).

The Israeli equivalent definition states in its section 6 of the Israel Mental Health Act of 1991 that "a district psychiatrist may direct in writing that any person be brought urgently for psychiatric examination if prima facie evidence has been produced to him that the person concerned fulfills all the following conditions: 1. he is suffering from an illness as a result of which his capacity for judgement or for assessment of reality is severely impaired; 2. he is liable to endanger himself or other persons by immediate physical danger; 3. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Comparing Aspects of Mental Health Legislation of Israel and Massachusetts
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Help
Full screen

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Style
    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

    Already a member? Log in now.