Electronic Funds Transfer Risks: ACH Risk Issues and Control Procedures

By Oz, Effy; Reinstein, Alan | The Journal of Bank Cost & Management Accounting, January 1, 1994 | Go to article overview

Electronic Funds Transfer Risks: ACH Risk Issues and Control Procedures


Oz, Effy, Reinstein, Alan, The Journal of Bank Cost & Management Accounting


ABSTRACT

Electronic Data Interchange is the most prevalent method that financial institutions use to transfer funds. In the U.S., an estimated $500 billion is transferred among financial institutions daily. While affording convenience and speed, Electronic Funds Transfer (EFT) also involves potentially serious security problems, requiring financial institutions to take special precautions in Automated Clearing House (ACH) activities. The purposes of this article are to enumerate some risks that financial institutions face in ACH activities and describe how to minimize such risks.

INTRODUCTION

The advent of information technology ushered in the paperless payment system among businesses. This paperless transfer, called Electronic Funds Transfer (EFT), is initiated by one party, passed through to the party's bank, dubbed ODFI (Originating Depository Financial Institution), and forwarded on to the Automated Clearing House (ACH) for delivery to the payee's financial institution, called RDFI (Receiving Depository Financial Institution). Thus, an EFT system is a computer-based network that enables the initiation, approval, execution and recording of payment transfers through electronic impulses and machine-sensible data-often leaving no physical audit trail. Financial institutions use three major forms of EFT's: remote banking services, retail point-of-sale services and direct deposit/preauthorized payment services. ACH's commonly call EFT's as ACH credit/debit transactions.

Despite the importance of these systems, many financial institutions fail to understand fully the potential credit risk and fraud related to ACH services. Credit risk and fraud are of particular concern during weak economic periods, when bankruptcies and business failures are more prevalent. The purposes of this article are to address the issues of EFT risks and to suggest measures to reduce exposure to such risks.

Two basic types of ACH transactions exist: ACH credits and ACH debits. ACH credit transactions transfer funds from the transaction's Originator to Receiver. Such transactions include the direct deposit of payroll, pension and annuity payments, corporate-to-corporate electronic data interchange (EDI) payments, and Federal Government Vendor Express Payments. ACH debit transactions transfer funds from the Receiver's to the Originator's account. Examples of ACH debit applications include preauthorized payments for insurance premiums, mortgage payments, health club dues and utility payments; cash concentration; dealer drafting collections; state tax payments; point-of-sale transactions; and third party initiated EDI debits.

ACH RISK ISSUES

As transaction and dollar volumes grow, so do concerns about potential risks. Financial institutions and their customers face four major categories of risk when processing EFT payments:

CREDIT RISK. The risk that a party cannot provide the contracted funds necessary to settle the account. Credit-risk-related losses typically arise from company failure or bankruptcy.

OPERATIONAL RISK. The risk that an employee or computer system unintentionally impedes the intended transaction, including losses due to clerical errors or to hardware and software failures.

FRAUD RISK. The risk that someone will intentionally alter a payment transaction in order to misdirect or misappropriate funds, including embezzlement initiated either by a financial institution's employee or by an interloper who gained unauthorized access to a system.

SYSTEMIC RISK. The risk that the inability of one participant to the EFT system to settle its commitments causes other participants to be unable to settle their commitments.

MINIMIZING ACH RISKS

Financial institutions have adopted several measures to prevent and control ACH risks.

CREDIT RISK

This type of risk falls mainly on the financial institution. Specifically, the ODFI assumes a greater credit risk in processing ACH transactions than does the RDFI, because the ODFI is exposed to credit risk for both ACH debit and credit transactions, while the RDFI is exposed to credit risk only when it handles ACH credit transactions. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • A full archive of books and articles related to this one
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Electronic Funds Transfer Risks: ACH Risk Issues and Control Procedures
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Help
Full screen

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Style
    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

    Already a member? Log in now.