Cold Warriors Target Arms Control

By Isaacs, John | Arms Control Today, September 1995 | Go to article overview

Cold Warriors Target Arms Control


Isaacs, John, Arms Control Today


While disagreements over the conflict in Bosnia have strained U.S. relations with Western Europe and Russia, these divisions will pale in comparison to the tensions that will arise if recent congressional arms control decisions become law. If the Republicans who dominate Congress are successful, a series of arms control agreements painstakingly negotiated by Republican and Democratic presidents could be consigned to the ash heap. This list includes the START I and START II nuclear reduction agreements, the 1972 Anti-Ballistic Missile (ABM) Treaty and the ongoing negotiations to achieve a comprehensive test ban (CTB) by 1996. U.S. leadership in the post-Cold War era will be undermined as the international community, already skeptical about this country's direction, will question the ability of the executive branch to surmount isolationist impulses.

Early Assault on Arms Control

In February, the House of Representatives launched the first attacks against the arms control consensus achieved since the last years of Ronald Reagan's presidency. Republicans brought to the House floor House Resolution (H.R.) 7, the national security portion of the "Contract With America." The language of this contract, touted by Republicans as an agenda for reshaping America, included a pledge to deploy both a national missile defense as well as theater missile defense systems "as soon as practical."

In a major surprise, this renewed drive for Reagan's Strategic Defense Initiative (SDI), or a variant of it designed to create a ballistic missile defense (BMD), stalled even while other elements of the contract went flying through the House. On February 15, the House voted 218-212 for an amendment offered by John Spratt (D-SC) that eliminated the commitment to deploy BMD. In a shrewd maneuver, Spratt forced the House to choose between military "readiness" and BMD--and readiness won out. The victory was important but only symbolic; even if the original language prevailed, the Senate never bothered to consider this portion of the contract.

In May, sobered by the previous defeat and aware of bipartisan skepticism about national missile defense, the House National Security Committee (previously named the Armed Services Committee) took a more cautious route when considering the annual defense authorization bill. The Republican-dominated committee pumped up funding for BMD, authorizing $3.5 billion, an increase of $628 million. National missile defense funding was more than doubled from the Clinton administration's original request of $371 million to $821 million.

The committee also added $135 million to Brilliant Eyes, a space-based sensor that could replace ground-based radars, which is funded separately from the BMD program.

In terms of policy, however, the committee refrained from endorsing outright a commitment to deploy a defensive system that would violate the ABM Treaty. It adopted non-binding language, stating that "It is the policy of the United States to deploy at the earliest practical date" both theater missile defenses and national missile defenses. Nevertheless, the defensive system outlined in the bill would be limited to 100 ground-based interceptors at a single site, "or a greater number of interceptors at a number of sites, as determined necessary by the Secretary [of Defense]." There was no timetable for deployment.

Republicans argued that they were not out to destroy the ABM Treaty. Curt Weldon (R-PA), who chairs the House National Security Subcommittee on Research and Development, emphasized on the House floor that he had no intention to attack the treaty frontally. On Tune 14, he stated during the floor debate on the authorization bill: "Our side, the conservative side, wanted to offer an amendment to take on the ABM Treaty in this bill and I said, 'If you do, I will come to the floor and I will lead the fight against it.' And that amendment was not offered."

In July, House Appropriations Committee Chairman Robert Livingston (R-LA) was briefly tempted to go directly at the treaty when his committee considered the annual defense appropriations bill. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Cold Warriors Target Arms Control
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Help
Full screen

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Style
    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    Buy instant access to save your work.

    Already a member? Log in now.

    Author Advanced search

    Oops!

    An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.