Devolution and Language Governance in Wales

By Cardinal, Linda; Boyer, Pierre | Inroads, Winter 2004 | Go to article overview

Devolution and Language Governance in Wales

Cardinal, Linda, Boyer, Pierre, Inroads

WITH THE WELSH LANGUAGE ACT 1993, WELSH WAS GIVEN OFFICIAL status in Wales. This status was further strengthened with the Government of Wales Act 1998, which confirmed that the language is an integral part of Welsh identity. With devolution and the establishment in 1999 of the National Assembly for Wales, a new framework for promotion of the language has come into existence. Welsh has passed from being a cultural to a public language enjoying official support. But its success as a public language is in no way guaranteed. Fortunately, the Assembly is committed to an ambitious program of revitalization, unprecedented in the history of Celtic languages in the United Kingdom.

Analogies between the situation of Welsh in Wales and that of French outside Quebec make the Welsh experience relevant to Canada. According to the 2001 census, 582,400 people in Wales, or 20.8 per cent of the Welsh population of almost 3 million, claim knowledge of Welsh. There are roughly the same number of francophones - or, more precisely, individuals who declare French as their mother-tongue - in Ontario. Institutionally, the situation of Wales most resembles that of New Brunswick. However, while New Brunswick is home to two identifiable linguistic communities, in Wales English and Welsh are two languages of one people.

The context: Devolution

Welsh devolution responded to demands for better representation of Welsh interests in the Union after years of neglect, particularly under Margaret Thatcher. The Labour Party advocated devolution as a way of resolving the issue, and acted promptly once elected.

Devolution of powers to Scotland, Northern Ireland and Wales was not the first time that the U.K. had reassessed the relationship among its constituent national communities. In the 19th century, Irish demands for self-determination were the major threat to the unity of the U.K., but there were also other forces attempting to redefine constitutional arrangements. In Wales, from 1886 to 1896, the Cymru Fydd (Wales of the Future) movement was an important advocate of a redefined status between Wales and England. In 1966, Plaid Cymru-The Party of Wales, as it is officially known, tried to put Home Rule onto the political agenda. Devolution is the latest response to these demands. It has, so far, been a success, but the degree of autonomy continues to be much debated, in Wales as in Scotland.

Technically U.K. devolution is not fed-, eralism because it is the product of legislation enacted by Westminster and, constitutionally, can be revoked, however remote such a scenario is in the case of Wales and Scotland. (The situation in Northern Ireland, where the devolved institutions have been suspended since October 2002, is another matter.) Robert Hazell, Director of the Constitution Unit at University College London, believes that devolution is here to stay. In his opinion, it has introduced a new form of civic engagement, more responsive and participatory, alongside traditional forms of politics. Only four years into the devolution process, Welsh citizens have more trust in their own Assembly, which they see as more accountable, than in Westminster. Devolution has also contributed to strengthening Welsh identity and to consolidating the multinational character of the U.K. state (see tables 1 and 2).

Trust in the Assembly and identification with Wales do not necessarily translate into strong civic participation. During the last Welsh election (May 2003), for example, less than 40 per cent of the population went to the polls. To some extent, this low turnout may be an expression of dissatisfaction with the limited devolution granted to Wales as compared to Scotland. In contrast to Scotland, the Welsh Assembly does not have primary legislative powers. This is one of the issues currently being examined by the Richard Commission, established in July 2002. It is expected to recommend the establishment of a Welsh Parliament with powers as extensive as those devolved to the Scottish Parliament. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Cite this article

Cited article

Citations are available only to our active members.
Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25,

Note: primary sources have slightly different requirements for citation. Please see these guidelines for more information.

Cited article

Devolution and Language Governance in Wales


Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25,

    New feature

    It is estimated that 1 in 10 people have dyslexia, and in an effort to make Questia easier to use for those people, we have added a new choice of font to the Reader. That font is called OpenDyslexic, and has been designed to help with some of the symptoms of dyslexia. For more information on this font, please visit

    To use OpenDyslexic, choose it from the Typeface list in Font settings.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    Buy instant access to save your work.

    Already a member? Log in now.

    Author Advanced search


    An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.