After Further Review: A New Wave of INNOCENCE COMMISSIONS

By Gould, Jon B. | Judicature, November/December 2004 | Go to article overview

After Further Review: A New Wave of INNOCENCE COMMISSIONS


Gould, Jon B., Judicature


As the work of the Innocence Commission for Virginia demonstrates, innocence commissions are an important, useful tool for improving a state's criminal justice process.

Two years ago, in this journal, Barry Scheck and Peter Neufeld argued for the creation of state and federal "innocence commissions ... to review the causes of any officially acknowledged case of wrongful conviction." These commissions, Scheck and Neufeld said, should "recommend remedies to prevent such miscarriages of justice from happening again."1

Scheck and Neufeld are perhaps best known for their creation and stewardship of the Innocence Project, a clinical program that brings together lawyers, professors, university students, and investigators to examine potential cases of erroneous conviction. But concern for wrongful convictions is hardly limited to Scheck and Neufeld or others in the defense bar. Since 2000, several commentators and legal organizations have called for the creation of innocence commissions or boards of inquiry,2 many patterned after those in Canada3 and the United Kingdom.11 Today, no fewer than 12 states have instituted committees or commissioned studies to evaluate the fairness of their criminal justice processes5-particularly those that govern capital cases-of which four have been charged with investigating wrongful convictions.6 Among these, however, only the Illinois, North Carolina, and Virginia commissions have completed reports on the sources of erroneous convictions.

Recent commissions

In Illinois, the Governor's Commission on Capital Punishment has been a bit of a hybrid, performing the functions of an innocence commission while focused primarily on problems in capital cases. The commission owes its inception to former Governor George Ryan, who established the body in 2000 out of concern that more individuals had been mistakenly sentenced to death in Illinois since 1973 than had actually been executed. Co-chaired by a former prosecutor and federal judge and by a former U.S. senator, the 14-member commission was charged with considering the state's system of capital punishment.

Although the Illinois Commission was not designed specifically as an innocence commission, its members conducted their own examination of the cases involving the 13 men released from death row. The result was a comprehensive report recommending 85 changes to Illinois' system of criminal justice and especially its investigation and prosecution of capital cases.7 In response to the commission's work, the Illinois General Assembly passed a reform bill in November 2003 that included more than 20 of the recommendations.8

In contrast to the Illinois Commission, which had a limited existence, the North Carolina Actual Innocence Commission is an ongoing entity that examines issues connected with wrongful convictions. Moreover, unlike in Illinois, the North Carolina Commission has not investigated specific cases. The North Carolina body is largely the work of the state's chief justice, I. Beverly Lake, who in 2002 "invited key representatives from the criminal justice system and legal academic community to meet with him to discuss the issue of the wrongful conviction of the innocent."9

After that meeting, the chief justice recommended a working study commission, which now meets on an interim basis to "identify the most common causations of conviction of the innocent, both nationally and in North Carolina," and to "issue interim reports recommending solutions for each causation issue identified."10 In October 2003, the North Carolina Actual Innocence Commission released its first report recommending measures to improve eyewitness identification procedures.11 Earlier this year, the commission's executive director, Christine Mumma, published a law review article discussing the work of the North Carolina Commission.12

Less is known about the Innocence Commission for Virginia (ICVA), which just now is completing a year's investigation into wrongful convictions in Virginia. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

After Further Review: A New Wave of INNOCENCE COMMISSIONS
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Help
Full screen

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Style
    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    Buy instant access to save your work.

    Already a member? Log in now.

    Author Advanced search

    Oops!

    An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.