Patterns in MPA Admission Decision-Making: An Application of Social Judgment Theory

By Bowman, James S.; Chen, Fiona F. et al. | Public Administration Quarterly, Fall 1993 | Go to article overview

Patterns in MPA Admission Decision-Making: An Application of Social Judgment Theory


Bowman, James S., Chen, Fiona F., Tinkersley, William B., Hilliard, Karen R., Public Administration Quarterly


What to teach and to whom are important issues in public administration. Indeed, after program accreditation became a reality in the 1980s, a task force questioned whether Master of Public Administration (MPA) degree requirements adequately served the needs of government (National Association of Schools of Public Affairs and Administration, 1987:13)

An essential part of this concern is the formulation of standards that relate to the abilities and accomplishments of program graduates. Several studies suggest that there is but a modest correlation between student selection criteria and academic, much less professional, success (Harnett and Willingham, 1979; Milner, McNeil, and King, 1984Q). Unless or until the outcome assessment movement (e.g., NASPAA, 1987; American Assembly of Collegiate Schools of Business, 1987; Poister and Ingraham, 1991) can establish a credible linkage between entrance requirements and program goals--reliable knowledge on the predictive validities of selection criteria--admission decisions will become increasingly controversial.

Facing legal scrutiny, official procedures should, at a minimum, accurately reflect requirements needed to gain acceptance in order to dispel suspicions of capricious actions and veiled motives. This empirical investigation estimates the relative importance of the selection criteria employed by individual MPA programs across the country.

The study addresses four questions relevant to admission decision-making. First, which selection criteria are most important to persons charged with making judgments regarding prospective students? Second, what is the form of the utility function for individual decision-makers with respect to each admission decision criterion? Third, do different program officials fall into discrete subgroups according to dependence on certain admission factors? Fourth, do decision-makers use different criteria and utility functions when predicting success than when making admission decisions; if so, how do these differ?

Such knowledge, along with the practices used to integrate application data, should be valuable to students and faculty alike. After the Literature Review and Methods sections, findings from a national survey on admissions decision-making patterns will be presented. The analysis concludes with a discussion of the implications of the data for MPA program standards.

LITERATURE REVIEW

Information about program rules is currently collected (e.g., NASPAA self-studies) but is not easily aggregated to permit a comprehensive perspective on MPA admissions standards. There are several published reports of specific schools, but small sample sizes and differential requirements limit their scope and generality (Klitgaard, 1985:19-23; Guyot and Wiedmann, 1982; Thompson and Kobrak, 1983). One national survey examined attitudes toward admission procedures and selection standards, but the subtleties involved in decision-making were not explored (Bowman, 1988).

Another national study (Bowman and Mangelsdorf, 1989), however, examined how selection criteria are combined by program officials when rendering judgments on applicants. In searching for an overall universal model of admission policies(1), the analysis concluded that "[w]hile it may be that in individual departments vigorous affirmative action policies in graduate admissions are pursued, no such policy favoring women and minorities exists in MPA programs across the nation (Ibid., 156).

The present research examines the same data set to describe decision models used by individual MPA programs. The focus is not on the validity of and attitudes toward selection criteria, but rather on understanding how complex decisions are made. Following Bowman and Mangelsdorf (1989), analysis of hypothetical, skeletal cases illuminate the way that entrance requirements are combined by program officials when making judgments.

METHODS

RESEARCH DESIGN

NASPAA principal representatives from 210 institutions throughout the United States were mailed a survey booklet, plus follow-ups, in 1988. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Patterns in MPA Admission Decision-Making: An Application of Social Judgment Theory
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Help
Full screen

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Style
    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    Buy instant access to save your work.

    Already a member? Log in now.

    Oops!

    An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.