Military Art and Science: An Academic Discipline

By Atkeson, Edward B. | Army, May 2005 | Go to article overview

Military Art and Science: An Academic Discipline

Atkeson, Edward B., Army

Almost three decades ago Professor Samuel Huntington published his landmark treatise, The Soldier and the State: The Theory and Politics of Civil-Military Relations. In the five hundred (plus) pages, he argued strongly for recognition of the military career field as a profession. Relying heavily on Karl von Clausewitz, he remarked:

The fact that war has its own grammar requires that military professionals be permitted to develop their expertise without extraneous interference. The "military virtue of an army" (Clausewitz's term) is not found in the nature of the cause for which it fights any more than the skill of the lawyer is judged by the persons of his clients. The inherent value of a military body can only be evaluated in terms of independent military standards.

While Huntington expressed cognizance of the wide variations of duties within the totality of land, air and naval services, he based his case on the stronger similarities and commonalities, which he suggested characterize the duties of all participants. While conceding that "the captain of a cruiser and the commander of an infantry division appear to be faced with highly different problems requiring highly different abilities," he went on to point out that there is a common "sphere of military competence" which includes the organizing, equipping and training of forces; the planning of their activities; and the direction of their operations in and out of combat. The skills with which these tasks are discharged, he averred, constitute the essence of military professionalism, regardless of the service or branch with which an officer might be identified.

Quoting Harold Lasswell's memorable phrase, Huntington crowned his case with the assertion that the military profession is unique and derives intellectual value from its focus upon "the management of violence."

As satisfactory as many observers may find Huntington's argument, it must also be noted that the second step-that of the identification of an academic discipline underlying the profession-has been slow to gain substantial recognition. Some have dismissed the effort as unworthy, preferring to view military service as a trade, rather closer to plumbing or electrical repair than to the more respectable fields of law, medicine or the clergy. And such views have not been limited to officials in academia. Prominent figures in uniform have, from time to time, argued against such recognition, expressing a fear of losing much of the spirit of physical achievement in military life to competitive requirements for study and writing, and, perhaps even further, to the point of losing a sense of service and subordination to the national political leadership.

But the Huntington school has not been without support from leading figures in the military services. Outstanding among important proponents was Lt. Gen. DeWitt C. Smith, commandant of the U.S. Army War College in 1975, who made a strong case for military art and science (MA&S) in an address to a distinguished group of visitors at the 21st Annual National security Seminar. He remarked:

The Army War College is dedicated to the highest professional military education of carefully selected, highly individual human beings. The academic discipline underlying our programs derives from our purpose and mission. It incorporates studies in those fields of academic and practical endeavor which constitute the military profession. This body of knowledge, a wide one, can be called "military art and science."

Another prominent spokesman in favor of broader recognition of military service as a professional pursuit with its own underlying discipline is Col. Lloyd J. Matthews, U.S. Army retired. Matthews contributed an important and detailed examination of the matter in ARMY Magazine in January 1994-perhaps one of the best yet by a member of the field.

He balanced his work with a summary of the arguments of opponents, but he persuasively led the reader through the debates to convincing conclusions. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Cite this article

Cited article

Citations are available only to our active members.
Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25,

Note: primary sources have slightly different requirements for citation. Please see these guidelines for more information.

Cited article

Military Art and Science: An Academic Discipline


Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25,

    New feature

    It is estimated that 1 in 10 people have dyslexia, and in an effort to make Questia easier to use for those people, we have added a new choice of font to the Reader. That font is called OpenDyslexic, and has been designed to help with some of the symptoms of dyslexia. For more information on this font, please visit

    To use OpenDyslexic, choose it from the Typeface list in Font settings.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    Buy instant access to save your work.

    Already a member? Log in now.

    Author Advanced search


    An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.