Legal Note: The Americans with Disabilities Act and Courthouse Access

By Lochner, Todd | Justice System Journal, January 1, 2005 | Go to article overview

Legal Note: The Americans with Disabilities Act and Courthouse Access


Lochner, Todd, Justice System Journal


Much of America's litigation takes place in older courthouses that were not originally designed with consideration of access to them by disabled persons. More recently constructed courthouses have been designed to provide access for the disabled, and many older buildings have been remodeled to do so. Yet some other courthouses, such as those lacking elevators, continue to present logistical problems for the disabled seeking to use them. Recent lawsuits challenging inadequate access, brought under federal antidiscrimination law, have raised important questions for court administrators and have posed for constitutional scholars the question of the extent to which a state enjoys sovereign immunity when one of its citizens accuses it of failing to comply with federal law requiring access for the disabled.

In Tennessee v. Lane, 124 S.Ct. 1978 (2004), a divided Supreme Court rejected the argument that suits from private individuals against state governments pursuant to Title II of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (ADA) violated state sovereign immunity under the Eleventh Amendment. Instead the Court held that, as to the specific issue of courthouse access by those with disabilities, Title II constituted a valid exercise of congressional authority under Section Five of the Fourteenth Amendment.

George Lane and Beverly Jones filed suit against the State of Tennessee in August 1998. They alleged that the state had violated their rights under Title II of the ADA by refusing to make county courthouses readily accessible to citizens who used wheelchairs. Lane, a paraplegic, had been charged with criminal conduct and was compelled to attend a hearing on the second story of a building that had no elevator. To make his first appearance, Lane crawled up two flights of stairs. During a return visit, Lane refused either to crawl up the stairs or to be carried up the stairs by court officers; consequently, he was arrested and jailed for failure to appear. Jones, who was also a paraplegic, was a court reporter. She alleged that she had lost work due to her inability to gain access to various county courthouses.

The state argued that the Eleventh Amendment's principle of state sovereign immunity barred such claims and moved to dismiss the suit, but the district court denied the motion. When the state appealed to the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals, the United States intervened to defend the statute's constitutionality. The court of appeals held the case in abeyance pending a Supreme Court decision in Board of Trustees of University of Alabama v. Garrett, 531 U.S. 356 (2001). In Garrett, the Court held that the Eleventh Amendment prohibited private suits seeking monetary damages from state governments under Title I of the ADA concerning employment discrimination, although it left open the question of whether suits under Title II alleging discrimination in pubic services, programs, or activities were similarly prohibited.

Following Garrett, the Sixth Circuit addressed the Title II question in a different lawsuit also raising questions related to the use of courts. A hearing-impaired litigant had sought damages for state failure to accommodate his disability in a child custody proceeding. Citing Garrett, the Sixth Circuit sitting en banc ruled that Title II suits based on equal protection principles were barred by the Eleventh Amendment, whereas Title II suits alleging a due process violation were not. Popovich v. Cuyahoga County Court, 276 F.3d 808 (6th Cir. 2002). Employing that rationale, the Sixth Circuit panel hearing the Lane case first affirmed the denial of the state's motion to dismiss, and then, in an amended opinion, explained that the lawsuit, by alleging a denial of the right of access to a court, necessarily involved a due-process claim. 315 F.3d 680 (6th Cir. 2003). Recognizing that the factual record below was incomplete, the court of appeals remanded the case to the district court for further proceedings. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • A full archive of books and articles related to this one
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Legal Note: The Americans with Disabilities Act and Courthouse Access
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Help
Full screen

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Style
    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

    Already a member? Log in now.