Lost Christianities: The Battles for Scripture and the Faiths We Never Knew

By Lamerson, Samuel | Journal of the Evangelical Theological Society, March 2005 | Go to article overview

Lost Christianities: The Battles for Scripture and the Faiths We Never Knew


Lamerson, Samuel, Journal of the Evangelical Theological Society


Lost Christianities: The Battles for Scripture and the Faiths We Never Knew. By Bart Ehrman. New York: Oxford University Press, 2003, xv + 293 pp., $30.00.

There is not likely a NT scholar in the United States who has not been asked about secret gospels, lost books of the Bible, and the Da Vinci Code. The novel has brought to the forefront questions that most Christians never think about. How did we get the sixty-six books in our Bible? Were there other books that did not "make the cut"? Are these books available for reading? The book under review, by professor Bart D. Ehrman, the Bowman and Gordon Gray Professor of Religious Studies at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (and, interestingly, a graduate of Wheaton College), answers many of those questions. The question for the review is, of course, does the work answer them accurately, fairly, and correctly?

The book, after an introduction, is divided into three sections: "Forgeries and Discoveries," "Heresies and Orthodoxies," and "Winners and Losers." The first section of the book deals with the discovery, both ancient and modern, of works that claimed to be "Christian." The most interesting chapter in this section presents Ehrman's thoughts on the secret Gospel of Mark. This work, discovered (or forged) by Morton Smith, has baffled scholars for years. Smith claimed to have found a section of an ancient work, photographed it, and presented his findings to other scholars. The problem came when other scholars wanted to see the actual document, not the photographs. Many have held that Smith forged this document as a high-tech joke on NT scholars. Others believe that this is an ancient document; a few even claim to have seen it. Ehrman marshals the evidence in this chapter and comes to a soft conclusion that Smith forged the document.

In the second section of the book Ehrman gives a brief overview of several early heresies. He spotlights the Ebionites, Marcionites, as well as several brands of Gnosticism. Ehrman hesitates to call these movements "heresies" because he feels that this is precisely the question that he is asking. Ehrman will argue that, because some of these works and movements came to be called heresies by the "proto-orthodox" movement, the books and doctrines held by these groups were not accepted into what finally became known as "orthodox Christianity." While no one can argue against the existence of serious doctrinal disagreements in the early Church, it is Ehrman's analysis as to why certain movements "won" that will be troublesome to evangelicals.

It is in the third section of the work, "Winners and Losers," that Ehrman begins to bring the wide body of evidence to bear on some conclusions. This section will prove to be the most controversial section based on a number of points. First, Ehrman uses a historical overview of the work of Reimarus to argue that there are differences in the Gospel accounts that "cannot be reconciled" (p. 169). Ehrman seems to want to argue that, because "each Gospel writer has an agenda-a point of view he wants to get across, an understanding of Jesus that he wants his readers to share" (p. 170), the Gospels then must be seen as something other than historical documents. It seems that the least Ehrman could have done here was to mention, in addition to the work of Reimarus, Baur, and Bauer, the work of historians like A. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Lost Christianities: The Battles for Scripture and the Faiths We Never Knew
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Help
Full screen

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Style
    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    Buy instant access to save your work.

    Already a member? Log in now.

    Author Advanced search

    Oops!

    An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.