Emerging International Issues: For Environmental Liability

By Russek, Karl | Risk Management, July 2005 | Go to article overview

Emerging International Issues: For Environmental Liability


Russek, Karl, Risk Management


Over the past decade, environmental insurance coverage has become a major focus for many sophisticated, U.S.-based risk managers. The greater awareness of environmental coverage largely stems from the enormous financial liabilities that CERCLA, or "Superfund" began imposing on many U.S. companies in the early 1980s. That awareness has further developed as the complex web of U.S. environmental regulation and liability issues thickened over the past 25 years.

With the promulgation of absolute pollution exclusions, the insurance industry responded with a variety of specialized pollution coverages. This initial response has now grown into a thriving specialty market with close to $2 billion in annual premium. A broad array of coverage is now available to protect businesses ranging from retail gasoline stations to strip malls, from drywall contractors to chemical plants.

Until recently, most of the attention to environmental liability insurance has focused on the United States. This is not surprising, insofar as the development of environmental regulation in the United States has been well ahead of much of the industrialized world. In addition, the very active U.S. tort environment has resulted in a host of legacy issues. Based on recent legislative developments around the world, environmental liability has now gone global, and its potential impact on coverage cannot be underestimated.

The European View

The member countries of the European Union have long been leaders in the area of environmental compliance, corporate social responsibility and the integration of environmental principals into land and product lifecycle planning. Despite that, they still do not have a comprehensive framework governing retrospective pollution liability, also known as liability for "sins of the past." Without a European Union version of Superfund and the various slate laws that mirror it, U.S. companies with operations in Europe have not been forced to develop the same level of awareness of their environmental legacy, and how that legacy might translate into sterling or euros on the wrong side of the balance sheet.

That the European Union has taken some time to develop a workable pollution liability model is not surprising, as the application of Superfund in the United States-for all its progress-has been a long and drawn out process. With a sizable share of every Superfund dollar still being spent on legal fees as opposed to cleanup, an outsider looking at the current system would be well served to pay attention to its faults. In addition, whereas the United States has an industrial history dating, in most cases, no further back than the Civil War, many EU countries have areas that have been the location of polluting industries for many hundreds of years, with impacts that in some cases pre-date current national borders. These factors, along with the complexities of Grafting policy to be applied in countries as different as the United Kingdom, Belgium, Portugal and Poland, are enough to force any policy-making body to tread carefully.

Nevertheless, after many years of debate, the EU adopted sweeping environmental legislation in 2004 that holds polluters liable for environmental damage. The 25 member countries of the EU must adapt their environmental regulations or create new ones from scratch to comply with the new EU Directive on Environmental Liability. While the directive does not explicitly carry the same "joint and several" liability components as Superfund in the United States, there is clearly a solid element of retrospective liability on the part of historic polluters in the text. Thus, any risk manager whose company currently has, or has had, operations in current EU stales should be aware of the new regulatory environment.

In addition, the directive acknowledges the importance of financial security in any scheme built upon the "polluter pays" principle. Although the directive does not make environmental insurance compulsory, the EU guidance specifically calls on member states to evaluate the use of environmental insurance as a way to address these newly codified liabilities. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • A full archive of books and articles related to this one
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Emerging International Issues: For Environmental Liability
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Help
Full screen

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Style
    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

    Already a member? Log in now.