Best Practices: Software Evaluation for Mid-Sized Organizations

Business Credit, September 2005 | Go to article overview

Best Practices: Software Evaluation for Mid-Sized Organizations


Introduction

Enterprise software solutions promise dramatic improvements in your business. Successful implementations have shown that promise to be achievable, if the right solution is selected. Nearly 30 years working directly with mid-sized organizations in hundreds of software evaluations provides a unique perspective. At some organizations, software selection begins a process of rapid business re-engineering and delivers significant value to the organization very quickly. Other organizations struggle with the evaluation process, stretching the evaluations to years in length, and delaying any anticipated benefits of the solution for even longer, if they are ever realized at all. The Gartner Group, a technology research firm, notes that half of enterprise system implementations fail to produce a positive return on investment in the first five years! The key to achieving positive results: effective management of the software evaluation and implementation processes.

While this basic advice holds true for all organizations, mid-sized organizations face a unique set of challenges. Mid-sized organizations have the business process complexity of the Fortune 500, but not the staffing levels. Keeping management ranks lean is critical to the success of mid-sized organizations. Rarely do mid-sized organizations find that they can spare a manager full-time for an evaluation or implementation project. More frequently, several managers participate on a part-time basis in the project, balancing the evaluation and implementation tasks with the daily pressures of keeping the business going. In this high-pressure environment, there is an even greater need to keep software evaluations and implementations focused and on track.

In addition, today's Enterprise software solutions must be evaluated differently than those in the past. Years ago, different systems varied significantly in the features and functions offered, and solutions were measured by what they could do for your business as you were managing it at the time.

Today, evaluations must focus on how the solution will deal with change. Changes in federal and state regulations will mandate changes in your business system. Changes in technology will mandate changes in your business system. Changes in your management philosophies will mandate changes in your business system. Enterprise systems must change in response to each of these changes. Consequently, today's software evaluation must focus more on the vendor as a partner in managing change than on the software as a collection of features. The solution must not be viewed solely on its ability to respond to today's needs, but on the vendor's ability to deliver on tomorrow's needs.

Most managers, however, will have limited experience in managing a software evaluation or implementation. Without significant experience in managing dozens or hundreds of software evaluations, how can managers expect to be effective in evaluating the alternatives? This article brings together the best practices of software evaluation at mid-sized organizations. By learning from the best practices of hundreds of successful evaluations at other midsized organizations, today's managers can make better decisions about their own software evaluations.

The best practices that emerge from software evaluations at successful mid-sized organizations do not point to a specific product or feature set, but define a successful evaluation process. This process uses a straightforward approach to help organizations quickly establish and value the differences in vendor offerings, minimizing the resources involved in identifying the ideal vendor. This way, more resources can be focused on the confirmation of the value offered by the ideal vendor, leading to a more confident and less risky end result.

The process divides the evaluation workload between an "Executive Team" and a "Project Team" within your organization.

The Executive Team

The Executive Team must be formed from the executive(s) responsible for determining the goals and objectives for the project. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Best Practices: Software Evaluation for Mid-Sized Organizations
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Help
Full screen

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Style
    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    Buy instant access to save your work.

    Already a member? Log in now.

    Author Advanced search

    Oops!

    An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.