Will the Greens Close Down New Zealand?

By Moran, Alan | Review - Institute of Public Affairs, September 2001 | Go to article overview

Will the Greens Close Down New Zealand?


Moran, Alan, Review - Institute of Public Affairs


REVERING FALSE GODS

The New Zealand Government may be on the verge of worshipping the Green Baal and throttling the nation's agriculture by banning biotechnology.

The implications of this are particularly profound for Australia. We share many regulatory, political and commercial institutions with New Zealand, not the least being a common regulatory oversight over food. Our economies are closely integrated and cultural ties are strong. In simple terms, New Zealand's decision to turn its back on the modern world would put pressure on Australia to consider doing likewise.

Preventing the approval of genetically modified (GM) foods has become the talisman of many activists around the world. They argue that the technology may be unsafe. They clothe their opposition to the technology behind the nefarious `precautionary principle' (which would prevent any new technology in any industry). Other strings to their opposition bow include calls for full information (which would impose considerable costs) or claims about possible adulteration of organic crops.

In fact, genetic engineering is what humans have been doing with plants ever since we ceased to be huntergatherers. The modern technology which directly modifies plants' genetic structure is now commonly used across a range of foods, and totally dominates the production of two of the most common foodstuffs--corn and soybean. For ten years now, the USA has been a vast testing ground for the technology. This followed the Food and Drug Administration (among other regulatory bodies) certifying the plant adaptations as safe. 200 million Americans have been eating GM food every day for the past six years.

The result? On the one hand, not one death, not one hospitalization, not one tummyache. On the other, a vast lift in productivity as farmers were able to reduce pesticide usage. Future gains are in the offing from GM developments that allow water conservation, plant growth in saline areas, improved ripening characteristics, plant incorporation of vitamin additions and a host of other productivity and health improvements

GM is, however, a potent symbol for the Green levellers opposed to all modern technology, other than that which allows them to network on the Internet and travel to demos. In Europe, radical Greens and their cohort consumerists have been busy destroying experimental crops wherever they can find them. Not for them the scientific process of examining the evidence and determining future action in the light of it!

ALL EYES ON THE KIWIS

For the past two years New Zealand has been an improbable world centre for reviewing GM technology. The Green Party and the left-wing Alliance Party count many GM opponents among their supporters. For some of these the task is to undermine globalization (code for `US domination'). Others see it as a means to arrest economic progress and return us to the simpler, less changeable world to which they affect a romantic attachment.

A Royal Commission was established, at the Green and Alliance parties' behest, to sift through the scientific evidence and determine whether or not this new technology had a place in New Zealand.

Given the pivotal nature of agriculture to the prosperity of New Zealand, this should have been unnecessary. New Zealand, like Australia, cannot afford the luxury of low-tech, or lagging, agricultural methods. But such notions would never impress the Enemies of Progress, who saw two benefits in having a Royal Commission. First, it could be used as an excuse to justify a `moratorium' on any developments and inground tests. Second, this (and the publicity it would bring) could be used to energize their supporters and spread scare campaigns. It was also thought by some that a Royal Commission might offer ambiguous findings or even be gullible enough to sympathize with their own views.

The Royal Commission was chaired by Sir Thomas Eichelbaum, a former Chief Justice with an impeccable legal and analytical reputation. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Will the Greens Close Down New Zealand?
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Help
Full screen

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Style
    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    Buy instant access to save your work.

    Already a member? Log in now.

    Author Advanced search

    Oops!

    An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.