Faculty Web Grade Entry: University of Phoenix

By Elisala, Tandy R. | College and University, Spring 2005 | Go to article overview

Faculty Web Grade Entry: University of Phoenix


Elisala, Tandy R., College and University


The University of Phoenix is a large, private, four-year university with a commitment to providing timely and efficient student services. With continued growth and process improvement opportunities utilizing technology, the institution had an opportunity to automate and streamline grade processing. This article focuses on the Faculty Web Grade Entry project at the University of Phoenix and will discuss:

* Background

* Project plan, old vs. new process, and timelines

* Communication strategies

* Implementation plan, monitoring, and measurements

* Summary/lessons learned.

Background

The University of Phoenix processes over 1.5 million grades annually. At the time of project implementation, we had 50 grades staff and 8,000 faculty members across all 26 campuses (now there are over 11,000 faculty members). As it relates to this process, all campus locations are responsible for attendance and grade entry. The Registrar's Office in Phoenix, Arizona, is responsible for ensuring the academic rules are supported in our student systems, performing quality control checks on grades processed, and processing all grade changes.

Prior to faculty grade entry implementation, grade processing time averaged 21 days from the course end date. Faculty would turn in their final grade rosters to their local campus, which would enter the grades in our student system. Our objectives with this project were to:

* Reduce overall grade processing time by 75 percent or 14 days.

* Make grades available on the Web.

* Streamline the process internally through bypassing the 'middle person' and allowing campus student services staff to grow at a slower pace and focus on more valueadded activities.

* Utilize technology wherever possible.

* Reduce paper.

Project Plan and Timelines

Our goal was to roll out our faculty grade entry process to everyone in September 2000. To accomplish this, we started working with our Information Technology department in February 2000 to begin defining the rules. The stakeholders and their role in this project included:

* Registrar-Project & Business Lead

* The Provost, Senior Vice President for Academic Affairs and Senior Vice President for Student Services-Overall approval and project support and sponsorship

* Deans and Campus Directors of Academic Affairs-Hone the academic and operational requirements and be responsible for faculty communication and training

* Campus Directors of Operations-Communicate this change to campus student services staff, hone operational requirements, and implement process changes

* Information Technology Department-Technical analysis, development, testing, monitoring, and modifications needed

* Faculty-Test the new system, provide feedback, and implement new process

* Registrar's Office Staff-Business requirements contributor, testers, and quality control check the process for goday period

PROJECT TIMELINE

* Communicate project request volunteers and gather small committee to define initial requirements (Feb '00)

* IT develops prototype for review (Mar '00)

* Gather stakeholders to kick off project and review proposed process (Apr '00)

* Make modifications and establish implementation time-frame (Apr '00)

* Develop communication plan, training plan, and all training documents (Apr '00)

* Recruit faculty and campuses for testing (May '00)

* Test new application and make modifications (May '00)

* Extend pilot to larger faculty and campus population (Jun '00)

* Send reminder communication, finalize IT requirements, and make internal changes to prepare for new process (Jul '00)

* Install training and communication materials on Web (Aug '00)

* Implement University of Phoenix-wide (Sep '00)

* Monitor and quality control (90 days)

* Work with new and existing campuses to ensure appropriate faculty training (ongoing)

Before faculty grade entry via the Web, grade entry was a five-step process; afterwards it became a two-step process. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Faculty Web Grade Entry: University of Phoenix
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Help
Full screen

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Style
    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    Buy instant access to save your work.

    Already a member? Log in now.

    Author Advanced search

    Oops!

    An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.