Separate and Unequal Effects: Information, Political Sophistication and Negative Advertising in American Elections

By Stevens, Daniel | Political Research Quarterly, September 2005 | Go to article overview

Separate and Unequal Effects: Information, Political Sophistication and Negative Advertising in American Elections


Stevens, Daniel, Political Research Quarterly


This article examines the effects of negative political advertising in American elections. Studies of negative advertising have become unproductively bogged down on the question of whether or not more or less exposure to negative advertising leads to higher or lower turnout. I take a step back in the causal chain by looking at its effect on the kinds of information individuals bring to the voting decision. I present and test a theory that individuals lower in political sophistication gain little or no information from negative advertising. In contrast, higher sophisticates gain a great deal of information. The theory is tested in an experiment and through analysis of American National Election Study (ANES) data. The results are largely confirmatory. Analysis of the ANES data also illustrates that the effects of exposure to negative advertising on information levels differ from, and are more normatively troubling than, those of positive advertising.

Campaigns are the principal arena in which public officials and ordinary citizens interact over matters of public policy. In American elections political advertising is perhaps the central medium of campaign communication from rulers to ruled: candidates and their supporters spend vast amounts of money on advertising, and political advertising provides more televised information about candidates than does news (Kern 1989; Patterson and McClure 1976). The fact that political advertising is also frequently derided as shallow, manipulative, and ultimately detrimental to informed choice (e.g., Kamber 1997), particularly as according to conventional wisdom it has become more negative, has produced concern about its effects, not only in the United States but in other nations where elections are increasingly "Americanized" (Aronoff 2000; Lee, Tak, and Kaid 1998; Schoenbach 1996).

Disquiet over a potential connection between negative political advertising, the modern campaign, and public disillusionment with politics and elections in America has prompted a wealth of research.1 Much of it has drawn conclusions that are far more sanguine than Kambers (Finkel and Geer 1998; Freedman and Goldstein 1999; Goldstein and Freedman 2002; Kahn and Kenney 1999a), but some has not (Ansolabehere and Iyengar 1995; Houston and Roskos-Ewoldsen 1999). Most of this research explores the direct behavioral impact of negative political advertising, especially on turnout, while there has been far less examination of the informational effects that precede behavior. Indeed, Lau et al.s (1999) exhaustive meta-analysis of the most prominent academic studies of negative advertising includes only three unpublished works that looked at its impact on information about candidates.

This is surprising for two reasons. First, one of the fundamental roles of campaigns is in helping citizens to make an informed choice. Campaigns should teach citizens the "attitudes, temperaments, and competence of candidates; their policy commitments and intentions; their past actions in both public and private life; their party and other affiliations" (Kelley 1960, 12). More informed citizens are better able both to identify and articulate their true interests and are more likely to participate in elections (Delli Carpini and Keeter 1996; Downs 1957; Verba and Nie 1972); both are fundamental to democracy. Second, given that there is so much contention about the size and direction of negative advertising's behavioral effects one might expect an enhanced focus on possible explanations for the conflicting findings. The premise of this study is that rather than continuing to engage in more studies of the direct behavioral impact of negative advertising, the potential for greater understanding lies in going further back in the causal chain. If negative advertising affects political behavior such as turnout, it is surely the product of a multitude of reactions and responses to exposure in which changes in cognitive and affective information about candidates-leading to or from indifference or alienation (Downs 1957), for example-precede the behavioral decision. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Separate and Unequal Effects: Information, Political Sophistication and Negative Advertising in American Elections
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Help
Full screen

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Style
    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    Buy instant access to save your work.

    Already a member? Log in now.

    Author Advanced search

    Oops!

    An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.