Slicing the Pie ... Information Technology Cost Recovery Models

By McAdam, Joseph P. | The CPA Journal, February 1996 | Go to article overview

Slicing the Pie ... Information Technology Cost Recovery Models

McAdam, Joseph P., The CPA Journal

And so the three chefs sat around this warm, steaming, freshly baked, deep-dish apple pie, enjoying its sweet aroma yet anticipating the dilemma of how to slice it fairly for sharing among their respective customers.

"I have an idea," one of the chefs said. "Whoever slices the pie gets to pick the last piece."

"But my customer is the largest consumer of pies, said another, "and should have the biggest piece After all, the pies are only as cheap as they are because my customer buys so many."

The third leader opined, "My staff has a super-duper, enhanced, upgraded microslicer with the latest BIOS release, that can help us cut exactly equal por tions. I'll get three of my people in here as soon as possible, and we'll have equal slices by the end of the week."

The other two chefs looked at each other and nodded in agreement. So the three chefs went about their business, confident that they had arrived at the most equitable solution for sharing the pie...

Information technology organizations today continually find themselves in this quandary: What is the most appropriate (i.e., accurate and equitable) cost recovery methodology to use in a corporate structure with multiple independent operating units sharing a centralized systems organization? Financial support organizations have been "caught unaware" because recovery methodologies that worked well in the glass house have proved inadequate in today's glass menagerie.

Enter the Dragon

The paradox of a decentralized, client/server architecture, which still requires, bandwidth, routers, etc., in its backbone, has left the bean counter with dollars to allocate the numerator but no basis left for further allocation. Some time ago, even data network cost recovery could reasonably piggyback on mainframe utilization. Since then, host systems have become great places to maintain humon gous amounts of data, but users like both the control of manipulating data, and the graphic user interface front ends provided by local (client or server, shrinkwrapped or home-g rown) applications.

Thus, the pendulum has begun to swing away from a model where CPU utilization was representative of network consumption toward a model where the number of entry points into the network drives cost. Unfortunately, today's networks, comprised of multicolored zebras (many different devices supplied by many dif ferent vendors and manufacturers), do not lend themselves to any reliable basis on which to employ algorithms.

Enter the Politicians

So, how to recover these informationtechnology costs that evolving technologies now leave us holding? The answer lies not only in the tools available (pur chased or home grown), but also in the corporate culture and organizational structure that exists. Consider addressing the following two models:

The IT organization has complete autonomy/authority in determining appropriate IT resource levels for the corporation, or the IT organization yields to political pressures, based on reporting structure, in designing, implementing, and supporting architectures.

In an organizational structure where it is a stand-alone entity (a "peer" of the operating units), that organization must be chartered with provisioning IT resources and services at a level appropriate for the corporation, not for the operating unit(s) with the most political clout. In order for this model to succeed, however, a basic tenet of maintaining centralized IT resources must hold true:

Pooling together the operating units' demand for T resources brings significant negotiating and purchasing power (i.e., better pricing, lower costs) to the corp ration as a whole. Making volume commitments to vendors/suppliers will benefit the corporation's ability to leverage vendors' pricing and technological direction, and will not jeopardize any operat ing unit's ability to achieve and/or maintain a competitive edge.

Many of today's charge-back models are not developed in high-level, closed-door negotiations or work sessions. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Cite this article

Cited article

Citations are available only to our active members.
Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25,

Note: primary sources have slightly different requirements for citation. Please see these guidelines for more information.

Cited article

Slicing the Pie ... Information Technology Cost Recovery Models


Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25,

    New feature

    It is estimated that 1 in 10 people have dyslexia, and in an effort to make Questia easier to use for those people, we have added a new choice of font to the Reader. That font is called OpenDyslexic, and has been designed to help with some of the symptoms of dyslexia. For more information on this font, please visit

    To use OpenDyslexic, choose it from the Typeface list in Font settings.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    Buy instant access to save your work.

    Already a member? Log in now.

    Author Advanced search


    An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.