State Discretion in Welfare Spending: Do Nonprofits Have an Impact?

By Burbridge, Lynn C. | Public Administration Quarterly, Spring 2005 | Go to article overview

State Discretion in Welfare Spending: Do Nonprofits Have an Impact?


Burbridge, Lynn C., Public Administration Quarterly


ABSTRACT

Using data compiled for the 50 states, this study examines state discretion in welfare programs by defining a set of programs that, in 1995, gave considerable discretion to the states and a set of programs that did not. It explores the effect of nonprofits on discretionary and non-discretionary programs. The study finds mat the categorization of programs by degree of discretion is problematic at best, given different forms and avenues for discretion. It also finds that the nonprofit sector had its biggest impact on programs with the most mandates from the federal government.

INTRODUCTION

This paper compares the influence of various factors on state programs that have been subject to large amounts of federal influence to those in which the states have had considerably more discretion. While there have been many studies of the impact of social, economic, and political variables on state welfare policy, most have focused on benefit levels for Aid to Families with Dependent Children (AFDC), the now-defunct entitlement program for unemployed mothers with children. Or studies have focused more broadly on total state spending on welfare. This study disaggregates state spending on welfare, separating out those programs over which states have had the most discretion. It will examine two key questions: (1) can the extent of state discretion be measured; (2) what is the role of nonprofit organizations in influencing discretionary and non-discretionary programs?

In light of recent changes in policy, giving more discretion to the states in regard to welfare, these are relevant issues. Nonprofits have always played an important role in state welfare systems. Will greater discretion result in a larger or smaller influence for nonprofits9 Conceivably nonprofit organizations are more numerous and potentially more powerful at the state and local level than at the federal level. And freedom from federal guidelines provides state legislators and administrators more leeway to address the concerns of interest groups in the state.

Since the new state welfare systems are still evolving, it may still be too early to assess the impact of nonprofits under the new welfare reform law. This study will focus on the mid- 1990s shortly before devolution to the states, to obtain an understanding of the variables that predicted state decision-making prior to the implementation of welfare reform, comparing programs with a high degree of federal oversight to those with the greatest amount of state discretion. The results of this analysis may provide us with important clues as to what to expect in the years to come as the new welfare programs become fully operational.

BACKGROUND

State Welfare Systems

In the pre-devolution period, state welfare systems involved a range of programs in which they partnered with the federal government, but with the states role in the partnership showing a great degree of variability. The two largest programs serving the poor-Aid to Families With Dependent Children (AFDC) and Medicaid-imposed extensive mandates on the states. While participation in AFDC is technically an option to the states, the only jurisdiction that had not done so by the early 1990s was American Samoa (which only gained the right to participate in 1988). Virtually all the states had been involved in the federal program since the 1930s. States were able to set their own benefit levels, but were required to provide benefits equally across the state to all families that met the their standard of need. States were also required to establish an employment and training program for welfare recipients, to provide child care for those participating in these programs, to provide transitional child care for those who begin working and for those "at risk" of becoming welfare recipients without child care, to provide Medicaid to all recipients and transitional Medicaid to those who begin working, and to pursue child support from absent parents (U. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

State Discretion in Welfare Spending: Do Nonprofits Have an Impact?
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Help
Full screen

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Style
    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    Buy instant access to save your work.

    Already a member? Log in now.

    Oops!

    An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.