Antitrust Remedy Wars Episode I: Illinois Brick from Inside the Supreme Court

By Gavil, Andrew I. | St. John's Law Review, Summer 2005 | Go to article overview

Antitrust Remedy Wars Episode I: Illinois Brick from Inside the Supreme Court


Gavil, Andrew I., St. John's Law Review


INTRODUCTION

Few questions in antitrust law have proven to be as challenging as whether "indirect purchasers" should be authorized to seek damages for antitrust violations. Despite the seemingly unqualified language of section 4 of the Clayton Act,1 which creates a treble damage private right of action for "any person" injured in her business or property by virtue of an antitrust violation, indirect purchasers have been barred from seeking damages in federal court since the Supreme Court's 1977 decision in Illinois Brick Co. v. Illinois.2 At the same time, many such indirect purchasers, often consumers, have been authorized to seek the very relief barred in federal court under analogous but more expansive state antitrust laws. The Supreme Court specifically endorsed this dual-remedial scheme when, in California v. ARC America Corp.,3 it rejected arguments that Illinois Brick effectively preempted broader state antitrust remedies.4

Illinois Brick was animated by the Court's belief that permitting indirect purchasers to sue would be inconsistent with its earlier decision in Hanover Shoe, Inc. v. United Shoe Machinery Corp.,5 would diminish the incentives for private parties to file suit in federal court, would subject defendants to multiple damages, and would mire the court in complex battles over the apportionment of damages among various classes of plaintiffs at different levels of the product distribution chain. In short, the Court believed it would make for bad antitrust remedial policy.

In its larger context, Illinois Brick also reflected a developing and significant shift in the antitrust priorities of the Court; one that found profound expression in the Court's 1976-77 term. Whereas contemporaneous decisions like Continental T.V., Inc. v. GTE Sylvania Inc.6 sought to rein in the substantive prohibitions of the antitrust laws, which had come to depend in large part on the invocation of per se rules of illegality, Illinois Brick and Brunswick Corp. v. Pueblo Bowl-O-Mat, Inc.7 focused on restricting access to the Clayton Act's private treble damage right of action. Collectively, this trilogy of cases trumpeted a more sweeping message from the Court that today seems clear: antitrust laws had been interpreted too harshly and the private treble damage action had perhaps been used too expansively. Ironically however, Illinois Brick and ARC America together created a more vexing set of problems than those Illinois Brick sought to avert.

In this Article, I will examine the available papers of the Supreme Court justices from this critical period in the evolution of modern antitrust law and policy.8 To set the stage, Part I contrasts the state of antitrust in 1975 with that of 1990, emphasizing the fundamental shift that commenced at the Court in the late 1970s; a shift that was not at all limited to the new members of the Court-the four Nixon appointees, Chief Justice Warren Burger, Associate Justices Blackmun, Powell and Rehnquist, and Justice Stevens, appointed by President Ford. Indeed, Justice White, who had been on the Court since being appointed by President Kennedy in 1962, proved to be a key player with respect to indirect purchaser issues, authoring the majority opinions in Hanover Shoe, Illinois Brick, and ARC America.9 Justice Marshall, a Johnson appointee, authored the majority opinion in Brunswick.10

After a brief overview of what I call the "Illinois Brick quartet" in Part II,11 Part III will consider the available papers of the Justices who sat on the Court at the time of Illinois Brick: Justices Blackmun, Brennan, Marshall, and Powell. These papers illuminate all phases of consideration of the case, from the treatment of the petition for a writ of certiorari, to the evaluation of the merits of the case by the clerks and the Justices, and the evolution of the Court's majority and dissenting opinions. Perhaps the most striking discovery is that the initial conference vote in Illinois Brick was to affirm, upholding the right of indirect purchasers to sue. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Antitrust Remedy Wars Episode I: Illinois Brick from Inside the Supreme Court
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Help
Full screen

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Style
    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    Buy instant access to save your work.

    Already a member? Log in now.

    Oops!

    An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.