HMOs Behind Bars: Constitutional Implications of Managed Health Care in the Prison System

By Siever, Richard | Vanderbilt Law Review, May 2005 | Go to article overview

HMOs Behind Bars: Constitutional Implications of Managed Health Care in the Prison System


Siever, Richard, Vanderbilt Law Review


I. INTRODUCTION

In 1991, the Correctional Corporation of America (CCA) entered into a contract with the State of Tennessee to house and treat state prisoners at CCA facilities.1 In response to increased costs, CCA negotiated a contract with a physician to be the exclusive provider of medical services for one of its facilities.2 Essentially, this contract formed a managed health care system: the doctor's payment structure included a base salary, but it also incorporated financial incentives that could increase his overall compensation if he were to provide less care to inmates.3

Later, Anthony Bowman, a prison inmate with sickle cell anemia,4 died when prison health officials failed to transfer him for medical treatment.5 Bowman's mother sued CCA, asserting that the contract between the doctor and CCA violated CCA's Eighth Amendment obligation to provide adequate medical care.6 Furthermore, Ms. Bowman claimed that the financial incentive provisions of the contract motivated the doctor to delay transfer of the inmate to an outside hospital-the proximate cause of his death.7

The Bowman case, recently decided by the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals on jurisdictional grounds, left unanswered an important question regarding the scope of the Eighth Amendment and application of the Cruel and Unusual Punishment Clause. The United States Supreme Court recently readdressed the Clause's scope and the Constitutional standard, again affirming an ambiguous duty on the part of government.8 Problems concerning health care in the prison context, and the nature of this "duty" imposed upon the prison system remain unsolved given the subsequent advent of managed health care. How should the Court's standard apply to Bowman and future cases, given the managed care organization that allegedly failed to properly care for an inmate?

Part I of this Note describes the history and evolution of the Eighth Amendment prohibition of cruel and unusual punishment and its development within the context of prison health care. Part I also briefly discusses the current state of prison health care as it relates to the current problem. Because courts have never applied the Eighth Amendment to managed health care,9 Part II analyzes the most recent interpretations of the Court's Eighth Amendment jurisprudence, the nature of its obligation on the government, and applications of the right in circumstances analogous to managed health care. This Note also examines Bowman v. CCA, a contemporary case implicating the potential constitutional problem presented by managed care in prisons. Part III concludes that given the current case law surrounding the Eighth Amendment, and the nature of the prison's duty, an inmate could raise a valid constitutional claim. Finally, this Note proposes an analysis for courts to use in such circumstances, applicable to various forms of managed health care.

II. DEVELOPMENT OF THE EIGHTH AMENDMENT & THE REALITY OF PRISON HEALTH CARE

The government's responsibility to provide health care to prisoners arises under the Eight Amendment to the Constitution, which provides that "cruel and unusual punishment [shall not be] inflicted."10 Analysis of the Eighth Amendment's prohibition on cruel and unusual punishment demands a brief review of its history and continuing development. Critical to understanding current application of the right is acknowledging the fluid nature of the Eighth Amendment, which manifests itself in an "evolving standard of decency."11

A. Historical Evolution of Eighth Amendment

The Eighth Amendment's restriction regarding punishment stems from concerns that originated with the Code of Hammurabi, the earliest written code of laws, and the most famous of the Old Babylonian kings of Mesopotamia.12 Such ancient codes incorporated the "lex talionis," or "law of retaliation," the infamous rule proclaiming, "[e]ye for eye, tooth for tooth."13 Western civilization later adopted this standard in its vision of punishment that reflects the crime. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • A full archive of books and articles related to this one
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

HMOs Behind Bars: Constitutional Implications of Managed Health Care in the Prison System
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Help
Full screen

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Style
    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

    Already a member? Log in now.