CD Nears Deadline on CTBT; Entry into Force Still Unresolved

By Cerniello, Craig | Arms Control Today, May/June 1996 | Go to article overview

CD Nears Deadline on CTBT; Entry into Force Still Unresolved


Cerniello, Craig, Arms Control Today


WITH ONLY WEEKS remaining before the June 28 close of the Conference on Disarmament's (CD) second session of 1996the CD's self-imposed deadline for completing a comprehensive test ban (CTB) treaty in time for a signing ceremony in September-the chairman of the conference's test ban committee presented a draft treaty completely free of "brackets" denoting disputed language. The 88-page "chairman's text," offered May 28 by Ambassador Jaap Ramaker of The Netherlands, is intended to replace the heavily bracketed "rolling text."

As of mid-June, it appears that the CD's 37 member-states have informally accepted the draft treaty as the basis for the endgame negotiations in Geneva. On balance, Ramaker's text offers widely acceptable solutions to the critical outstanding issues facing the CD, which began its second session on May 13. These issues include scope; verification, especially regarding on-site inspections and the role of the International Data Center; the treaty's preamble; and the composition of the Executive Council. However, the proposed procedure for the treaty's entry into force remains highly controversial.

Ramaker's effort to bring the CTB negotiations to a close received a major boost June 6 when China offered to "temporarily" abandon its long-held call for a treaty provision allowing for peaceful nuclear explosions (PNEs), an option not included in the chairman's text. China has indicated, however, that it expects the PNE issue to be revisited in a treaty review conference expected 10 years after entry into force. If Beijing's proposal is accepted by the CD delegations, the core issue of the treaty's scope will be resolved.

Two days after the Chinese announcement, however, Beijing underscored its determination to complete its current testing program before signing a CTB treaty by conducting its 44th nuclear test at the Lop Nor test facility. (See p. 30.)

Australian 'Scope' Accepted

As anticipated, Ramaker's draft incorporates the Australian scope language, which would prohibit "any nuclear weapon test explosion or any other nuclear explosion." This language has been officially endorsed by the United States, Britain, France and, most recently, Russia. Russia's CD ambassador, Grigori Berdennikov, reaffirmed Moscow's commitment to this scope language during the May 13 plenary session.

In a June 6 speech to the CD, Chinese Ambassador Sha Zukang announced that "in order to facilitate the conclusion of the treaty within the time-frame as planned, the Chinese delegation is now ready to go along with a temporary ban on PNEs. Namely, China can agree to a treaty provision that the possibility of permitting the conduct of PNEs shall be considered by the review conference of States Parties." If the CD accepts this proposal, Sha said Beijing "will be in a position to favorably consider" the Australian scope language.

Verification Compromise

The chairman's draft also offers balanced solutions to the issue of the treaty's verification regime, especially concerning on-site inspections and the role of the International Data Center (IDC). CD delegates have pointedly debated whether information obtained from national technical means (NTM) of verification, such as satellites, may provide the basis for a request for an on-site inspection, or whether requests for such inspections must be based on data collected by the treaty's International Monitoring System (IMS).

Ramaker's text proposes that a request for an on-site inspection "shall be based on information collected by the International Monitoring System, on any relevant technical information obtained by national technical means of verification in a manner consistent with generally recognized principles of international law, or on a combination thereof." Under Ramaker's formula, the Executive Council will make a decision on the inspection request "no later than 72 hours" after it has been received from the requesting state-party. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

CD Nears Deadline on CTBT; Entry into Force Still Unresolved
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Help
Full screen

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Style
    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    Buy instant access to save your work.

    Already a member? Log in now.

    Author Advanced search

    Oops!

    An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.