The BIAS FREE Framework: A New Analytical Tool for Global Health Research

By Eichler, Margrit; Burke, Mary Anne | Canadian Journal of Public Health, January/February 2006 | Go to article overview

The BIAS FREE Framework: A New Analytical Tool for Global Health Research


Eichler, Margrit, Burke, Mary Anne, Canadian Journal of Public Health


ABSTRACT

Objective: To test the applicability of the BIAS FREE Framework in African settings.

Participants: Researchers from the Tanzanian National Institute for Medical Research, university and community-based researchers from Tanzania, the Gambia and South Africa.

Setting: National Institute for Medical Research, Dar es Salaam - Tanzania.

Intervention: An intensive two-day workshop to examine the applicability of the BIAS FREE framework within an African setting. This involved clarification of the following concepts: construction of knowledge, objectivity, logic of domination, hierarchy, power, sex and gender, disability, and race/ethnicity. The Framework identifies three types of bias problems that derive from social hierarchies based on gender, race and disability: maintaining hierarchy, failing to examine differences, and using double standards. Participants used the 20 diagnostic questions at the heart of the Framework to analyze various research publications, including some authored by participants.

Outcomes: Participants uniformly stated that the Framework is useful for uncovering bias in public health research, policy and programs; that it is immediately applicable in their work settings; and that doing so would improve equity in research and, ultimately, in health. One participant re-analyzed published data using the Framework and submitted a supplementary report with some new recommendations.

Implications: The applicability of the BIAS FREE framework has been demonstrated in diverse settings. It is now being offered for broader application as a tool for uncovering and eliminating biases in health research that derive from social hierarchies and for addressing the persistence of global health inequities.

MeSH terms: Research design; research methodology; objectivity; logic of domination; prejudice; social discrimination; gender bias; sexism; ableism; racism

RÉSUMÉ

Objectif : Tester les possibilités d'application d'un cadre d'impartialité (le BIAS FREE Framework) dans le contexte africain.

Participants : Chercheuses et chercheurs de l'Institut national tanzanien pour la recherche médicale et des milieux universitaires et communautaires de la Tanzanie, de la Gambie et de l'Afrique du Sud.

Lieu : L'Institut national pour la recherche médicale de Dar es-Salaam, en Tanzanie.

Intervention : Un atelier intensif de deux jours pour examiner les possibilités d'application du cadre BIAS FREE dans le contexte africain. Il s'agissait de clarifier les notions de construction des savoirs, d'objectivité, de logique de domination, de hiérarchie, de pouvoir, de sexe et de sexospécificités, d'in/capacité, de race et d'appartenance ethnique. Le Cadre définit trois types de biais découlant des hiérarchies sociales fondées sur les sexospécificités, la race et l'in/capacité, soit : le maintien de la hiérarchie, le non-examen des différences et l'emploi de deux poids deux mesures. Les participantes et les participants ont utilisé les 20 grandes questions diagnostiques du Cadre pour analyser divers articles de recherche (dont ils étaient même parfois les auteurs).

Résultats : Les personnes présentes ont uniformément déclaré que le Cadre était utile pour déceler les biais dans la recherche, les politiques et les programmes en santé publique. Elles ont affirmé également qu'elles pourraient appliquer le Cadre tel quel dans leur milieu de travail, et que son application améliorerait l'équité dans le domaine de la recherche et, en bout de ligne, dans celui de la santé. L'une des personnes présentes a refait, à l'aide du Cadre, l'analyse de données publiées, puis présenté un rapport supplémentaire comportant de nouvelles recommandations.

Conséquences : Les possibilités d'application du cadre BIAS FREE dans divers contextes sont démontrées. On offre maintenant ce cadre sous la forme d'un outil à plus grande échelle pour déceler et supprimer les biais de la recherche en santé découlant des hiérarchies sociales et pour aider à effacer les inégalités sur le plan de la santé mondiale. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Upgrade your membership to receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • A full archive of books and articles related to this one
  • Ad‑free environment

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Upgrade your membership to cite pages or passages in MLA 8, MLA 7, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Note: primary sources have slightly different requirements for citation. Please see these guidelines for more information.

Cited article

The BIAS FREE Framework: A New Analytical Tool for Global Health Research
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Help
Full screen
Items saved in your active project from this article
  • Highlights & Notes
  • Citations
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Style
    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Upgrade your membership to cite pages or passages in MLA 8, MLA 7, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

    Cited passage

    Search by... Author
    Show... All Results Primary Sources Peer-reviewed

    Oops!

    An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.