The Illusion of Territorial Jurisdiction

By Szigeti, Péter D. | Texas International Law Journal, October 1, 2017 | Go to article overview

The Illusion of Territorial Jurisdiction


Szigeti, Péter D., Texas International Law Journal


Table of Contents

Abstract.369

Introduction.370

I. Questioning Territorial Jurisdiction: The Vanishing Difference Between Strict Territoriality and Effects Jurisdiction.372

A. Between Geography and Metaphysics: MacLeod v. AttorneyGeneral for New South Wales and R. v. Keyn.374

B. Extending Territoriality: The Ambivalences of Effects Jurisdiction.379

II. The Ground that Moves Under Us: Manipulating Legal Territoriality.....382

A. Universality of Rights and Organizations....383

B. Mobile and Virtual Territoriality: Ships and Corporations......387

C. Anomalous Zones: Territories with Double Characteristics....389

III. Of Rules and Exceptions, or the Lack of Geographical Information in Law.393

IV. Towards Reconstructing International Jurisdiction.394

Conclusion.398

Introduction

According to the widely-received narrative about the rise and fall of territorial jurisdiction, territorial jurisdiction emerged in the 17th century alongside the territorial state. Territorial states created an interlocking territorial international order, often called the Westphalian order after the peace treaty that allegedly created it in 1648.1 Territoriality remained the organizing concept of the international order until around 1945, when it began its decline due to technological progress, which intensified after 1990.2 Before the 1920s, territorial jurisdiction "worked," but during the 20th century, "technical developments in the field of communications and of transmission of news and sound by telegram, telephone and wireless" disrupted the system by diminishing "the importance of mere physical distance-and therefore, of the territorial principle."3 Friedrich Mann laments "[t]he complications of modern life are responsible for the steadily increasing reluctance to 'localise' facts, events or relationships."4 Symeon Symeonides agrees: "With the advent of new transportation and communication means and the increased mobility of people, state boundaries became even less important, and Beale's insistence on territoriality as the dominant principle made even less sense than before."5 According to Kal Raustiala's authoritative history of jurisdiction in U.S. law, "[b]y the 1960s the idea that United States law was limited to American territory would seem quaint, almost a relic from another era."6 In this narrative tradition, the Internet is often portrayed as the pinnacle of this erosion of territory through technology.7 In the wake of territoriality, we have effects jurisdiction: Instead of asking, "Where did X event take place?" we ask, "Does X event have a large enough effect on us to justify the assertion of jurisdiction?"

Parts of this narrative have been challenged and reinterpreted during the last few years. The Westphalian legal order may have little to do with the Peace of Westphalia; territoriality may be traced back as early as the late 15th century,8 or it may have only become an accepted principle of political rule in the late 18th century.9 The Internet may not present as big of a shift as techno-libertarians and legal academics thought in the 1990s, because it only expands pre-existing types of communications and legal relations, which lawyers have gotten used to during the 20th century.10 This Article presents a different challenge, which uses both conceptual discussion and historical examples to display the illusory logic of territorial reasoning. Part I of this Article, relying primarily on late 19th-century case law, argues that territoriality is just as important today as it was in its alleged high point in the late 19th century-because effects jurisdiction is just as territorial as "strict" territorial jurisdiction. In fact, there is no meaningful difference between the two. Both effects jurisdiction and territorial jurisdiction utilize the same concepts, they just reach opposite conclusions. This is so because 19th-century decisions, while allegedly taking territoriality seriously, were in fact led to engage in similar metaphysical discussions on the location of the defendant's will or the place of her marital status, as modern courts are forced to do. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA 8, MLA 7, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Note: primary sources have slightly different requirements for citation. Please see these guidelines for more information.

Cited article

The Illusion of Territorial Jurisdiction
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Help
Full screen
Items saved from this article
  • Highlights & Notes
  • Citations
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Style
    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA 8, MLA 7, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    Buy instant access to save your work.

    Already a member? Log in now.

    Search by... Author
    Show... All Results Primary Sources Peer-reviewed

    Oops!

    An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.