The Criminalization of Online Hate Speech: It's Complicated

By Balica, Raluca | Contemporary Readings in Law and Social Justice, July 1, 2017 | Go to article overview

The Criminalization of Online Hate Speech: It's Complicated


Balica, Raluca, Contemporary Readings in Law and Social Justice


1. Introduction

Explicit hate has identified an overwhelming channel in the Internet that prolongs the duration of discrediting posts. Search engines index text on the web and generate it immediately. Indexed comments have no inherent expiration date (Peters and Besley, 2016), neither does the discomfort they bring about. Search engines create outcomes with links to harmful comments generated years earlier. Networked technologies epidemically bolster the public for cyber persecution. Online harassment may swiftly become a team sport (Bratu, 2016), with posters attempting to leave behind each other. Cyber mobs mobilize online to torment people in disgraceful and hostile manners. The Internet's effortlessness in disseminating information and the chance to bias search technology may intensify the maltreatment by propagating hurtful harassment over a large area. Cyber harassment targets may go into hiding to defend themselves from additional defamation. (Keats Citron, 2014)

2. Literature Review

The reorganization of the Internet may be an essential element in its acceptance as a large-scale democratic realm of communication. Unlike other kinds of communication employed to convey hate culture to the masses (Nagel, 2016), the Internet has come with its own unparalleled features which diffuse, alter, disguise, and assimilate hate speech (Tulloch, 2016) into the established popular online culture. A fortified and strikingly eloquent hate campaign is flourishing in the digital realm. Individuals may participate unswervingly, although digitally, in participatory democracy to generate change. (Klein, 2017)

Almost all states institute penalties for some kind of expression due to of its intolerable content, surmising value pluralism. A separate right of free expression defends obnoxious speakers from ubiquitous aggressions. The right is hindered against individuals who propagate animosity. With each step, people's analysis departs ever further (Machan, 2016) from democratic grounds. At one remove from democratic mechanisms (Nica, 2016a), the right of free expression defends obnoxious speakers by confining the capacity of legislatures or judges to suppress them. The right establishes a dispensation to the rule of democratic mechanisms with the aims of preserving democracy. At a second remove, hate speech interdictions indicate confines upon those restrictions, correspondingly intending to defend vulnerable individuals, and thus to maintain democracy. At a third remove, the hate speech interdictions should handle curbs of their own. Legislatures and courts should clarify how far (Popescu Ljungholm, 2016) they extend. (Heinze, 2016)

3. Methodology

The purpose of my analysis was to collect secondary data and make estimations concerning people at risk to be harassed online, kinds of online harassment, and the amount of hate crimes by recorded offence type. The new media underlying forces that have enabled hate to boom online are the digital infrastructure (Peters, 2015), which provides a fabric for extremists to associate with one another (Benedikter, 2016) and with mainstream culture (Lăzăroiu, 2016); the information context that supplies the environment of matters, news, politics, and research (Cheung and Leung, 2016) for such action groups to develop; and the online culture (Popescu and Ciurlău, 2016) in which immature users are steadily interacting (Maisuria, 2016), cooperating, learning, and advancing, but via which recruitment (Hayes and Jeffries, 2016) may also be accomplished. (Klein, 2017)

The law has had a negligible effect on cyber badgering, somewhat as a result of distressing social approaches. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA 8, MLA 7, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Note: primary sources have slightly different requirements for citation. Please see these guidelines for more information.

Cited article

The Criminalization of Online Hate Speech: It's Complicated
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Help
Full screen
Items saved from this article
  • Highlights & Notes
  • Citations
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Style
    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA 8, MLA 7, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    Buy instant access to save your work.

    Already a member? Log in now.

    Search by... Author
    Show... All Results Primary Sources Peer-reviewed

    Oops!

    An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.