Sex and Religion: Unholy Bedfellows

By Papandrea, Mary-Rose | Michigan Law Review, April 2018 | Go to article overview

Sex and Religion: Unholy Bedfellows


Papandrea, Mary-Rose, Michigan Law Review


SEX AND RELIGION: UNHOLY BEDFELLOWS

SEX AND THE CONSTITUTION: SEX, RELIGION, AND LAW FROM AMERICA'S ORIGINS TO THE TWENTY-FIRST CENTURY. By Geoffrey R. Stone. New York and London: Liveright Publishing Corporation. 2017. Pp. xxxii, 529. $35.

INTRODUCTION

In a lecture delivered in 2008, University of Chicago professor Geoffrey Stone1 confessed to the audience that he had been working on a book tentatively titled "Sexing the Constitution," a project of "reckless ambition."2 Almost ten years later, the book has hit the stands, renamed Sex and the Constitution: Sex, Religion, and Law from America's Origins to the TwentyFirst Century, at a time when debates about sex and religion are more heated than ever. Beginning with a survey of law and sexuality in Greek and Roman times, the book ends with an analysis of the Supreme Court's same-sex marriage decisions and their aftermath. The breadth of the work is staggering.

Stone covers so much territory in this book, including (but definitely not limited to) Saint Augustine's role in the evolution of Christianity's views on sexuality and sin; Anthony Comstock's role in the widespread passage of repressive laws banning pornography, birth control, and abortion; the limited role Roe v. Wade3 actually played in fermenting the rise of the pro-life movement; the history of the gay rights movement in the United States; the dramatic increase in public toleration for same-sex relationships and marriages; changes in communications technology that have undermined efforts to control explicit sexual images; methods of constitutional interpretation- the list goes on and on. Any of these topics could be-and have been-the subject of their own books. In the final analysis, though, Stone's primary thesis becomes clear: religious groups and individuals have, at various times throughout Western history, used the secular law to foist their beliefs upon nonbelievers.

Stone suggests that he disapproves of this religious influence in the law, but he wisely recognizes the limits of any argument that this influence is unconstitutional. The Supreme Court has never struck down a law because religious groups and individuals have advocated for the law on religious grounds, and Stone contends that to do so would violate both the Free Exercise and the Freedom of Speech Clauses of the First Amendment. He argues that courts should-and do-consider whether there is any justification for a law aside from religious reasons, and some laws will fail under this inquiry. But he recognizes that the universe of such cases is very small. His most ambitious argument is that laws that are based on "morality" alone are unconstitutional "[b]ecause of the clear religious overtones implicit in such 'moral' justifications" (p. 331). But this leaves open the possibility that laws will survive constitutional scrutiny as long as the government can come up with some other justification.

A second, much less developed theme that emerges from the history Stone shares with us is that many of the laws discussed in the book reflect anxiety and apprehension about the appropriate gender roles of men and women. Many organized religions, especially those that are most active and influential in our political debates, reflect rigid views of sexuality and gender. This suggests that rather than attack sex-related laws as attempts by religious groups to foist their beliefs on secular society-an endeavor Stone himself recognizes is largely doomed to failure-it may be more productive to attack these rigid conceptions of gender roles directly through equal protection challenges. Although this approach will not necessarily lead to the results that progressives desire in every case, it is more promising as a practical matter.

Part I of this Review focuses on Stone's attempt to correct some common misunderstandings regarding the history of laws relating to sex. Stone's focus on history naturally raises the larger issue of what role history should play in interpreting the Constitution. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA 8, MLA 7, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Note: primary sources have slightly different requirements for citation. Please see these guidelines for more information.

Cited article

Sex and Religion: Unholy Bedfellows
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Help
Full screen
Items saved from this article
  • Highlights & Notes
  • Citations
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Style
    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA 8, MLA 7, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    Buy instant access to save your work.

    Already a member? Log in now.

    Search by... Author
    Show... All Results Primary Sources Peer-reviewed

    Oops!

    An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.