Recent Trends in European SPAs and Comparisons with US Practice

By Feldman, Reid | Business Law International, September 2016 | Go to article overview

Recent Trends in European SPAs and Comparisons with US Practice


Feldman, Reid, Business Law International


Although today M&A practice in deals involving private targets in Europe and the United States has become largely standardised, in respect of the form of the share purchase agreement (SPA), considerable differences exist on some deal terms, including:

* payment arrangements;

* some representations and warranties;

* closing conditions;

* indemnification terms; and

* dispute-resolution provisions.

The extent of standardisation and the underlying differences are borne out not only by individual experience but also by empirical studies on SPAs, including the European M&A Deal Points Study ('EDPS 2015') and a similar study on deals for private targets in the US ('USDPS 2015').1

An illustration of these points, discussed below, can provide a useful framework for practitioners in the US confronted with negotiating deals in Europe (with the help of local counsel), or vice versa.

Beyond serving that practical purpose, review of those differences helps to put in perspective how SPAs function and guidelines for negotiating them. The key functions of the agreement are to make the transaction happen at favourable terms and to reduce risks and costs and/or allocate them acceptably. An attorney participating in the negotiation of a deal should of course be able to identify what technical deal terms, including best practices used in other jurisdictions, will maximise his or her client's position. But the attorney should also keep in mind the overall priorities for the deal, which do not always dictate taking a maximalist position on each technical drafting point.

Of course, deals may vary significantly from one to another, and technical drafting choices can be dominated by economic considerations, including the relative bargaining power of the parties, so the observations set out below should be applied to concrete cases with caution.

Further, review of European M&A practice must take account of the differences in legal systems among European countries, which may be more significant than the differences in the law of individual states in the US. In this connection, three points should be borne in mind:

1. When negotiating an SPA the most important rule is the same whatever law is chosen: the parties' rights and obligations will generally be determined by the terms of the SPA, so careful drafting is essential.

2. Although by virtue of European Union (EU) law2 and the domestic law of all or virtually all European countries the parties have freedom to choose the law applicable to their SPA,3 it is inevitable that the SPA will have to take account of the law of the countries where the target is incorporated (which is the applicable company law) and where it has operations (whose law will apply to such matters as its relations with its employees). Consequently, unnecessary confusion and complexity can be avoided by choosing the law of one of those countries. Indeed, in 77 per cent of the SPAs in the EDPS 2015 sample, the law applicable to the SPA was the law of the place of principal activity of the target.

3. Although most of the key provisions in an SPA will be equally enforceable whether the applicable law is that of the country of the target, the buyer or the seller or some other country, there may be some issues - such as sensitive matters like sandbagging (see below) - on which the law of those countries will differ, and only local counsel can identify and advise on those points.

This article sets out below observations regarding: (1) standardisation, within Europe and with the US; and (2) some salient differences in SPA drafting between Europe and the US.

Standardisation

The now-standard approach to drafting SPAs in Europe and the US is well established in both civil and common law countries, and has displaced former local drafting approaches (such as documentation defining the seller's obligations as those 'provided by law' and little else, or the former tax-driven approach used in France featuring three separate agreements: parallel options to buy and sell and a separate indemnification contract). …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA 8, MLA 7, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Note: primary sources have slightly different requirements for citation. Please see these guidelines for more information.

Cited article

Recent Trends in European SPAs and Comparisons with US Practice
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Help
Full screen
Items saved from this article
  • Highlights & Notes
  • Citations
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Style
    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA 8, MLA 7, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    Buy instant access to save your work.

    Already a member? Log in now.

    Search by... Author
    Show... All Results Primary Sources Peer-reviewed

    Oops!

    An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.