Context Analysis of Top Seven Retracted Articles: Should Retraction Watch Revisit the List?

By Jan, Rosy; Bano, Shohar et al. | Library Philosophy and Practice, December 2018 | Go to article overview

Context Analysis of Top Seven Retracted Articles: Should Retraction Watch Revisit the List?


Jan, Rosy, Bano, Shohar, ur Rehman, Syed Ikhlaq, Mehraj, Midhat, Library Philosophy and Practice


INTRODUCTION

The loss of ethics, delinquency or fraud in research indicates the lack of dedication and honesty of knowledge- seeking behavior of a researcher/scientist. Scientific misconduct includes multiple practices such as falsification of results, plagiarism, in consistency in data, image duplication and compromised peer review. The identification of research misconduct in a research article leads to its retraction (Greitemeyer, 2014). Noorden (2011) defines retraction as "science's ultimate postpublication punishment: retraction, the official declaration that a paper is so flawed that it must be withdrawn from the literature". Prior to retraction an article with slight error or incorrect information might be sent an alteration message or in a more acute case "expression of concern" may be issued (Grieneisen& Zhang, 2012). Even though retractions are uncommon, a number of studies suggest that retractions are on the rise with reference to overall growth in scientific literature (Marcus &Oransky, 2014). The growing rate of retracted scientific articles is an alarming trend. Any retraction speaks to an enormous misuse of scientific assets and the publication of retracted literature can erode the faith of public in science (Fang &Casadevall, 2011). Retraction of an article can take many years from the time of its publication till retraction depending on the reason of retraction. Articles involving misconduct take longer time to be retracted than erroneous papers (Steen, 2011; Fang, Steen &Casadevall, 2012; Moylan &Kowalczuk, 2016). However, studies suggest that articles continue to be cited even after their retraction (da Silva &Dobranszki, 2017; da Silva & Cimenti,2017). Citations to flawed research propagates error and can be dangerous particularly in medical literature where patients are put to risk by flawed research (Steen,2011). When researchers approvingly cite erroneous articles a number of problems arise. First, such citations make erroneous paper credible. Second, approvingly citing erroneous research to defend a claim implies that evidence for the claim is good. Finally, a reader may go on to write other articles prompted by the invalid point, citing the flawed article for support, or share the point as fact with other people, propagating the error (Sood& Cor, 2017). In order to find out type of propagation of error the study is initiated to find out the context in which the citing authors/ articles quote the retracted information. This study is therefore, an attempt to focus on the number of post retraction citations received by top seven highly cited retracted articles with particular reference to the nature of post retraction citations to these articles.

PROBLEM

Since it is deemed by many studies that citing the retracted article propagates the false signs. The study is based on context analysis of post- retraction citations to top seven highly cited retracted articles to carefully examine the exact mention of the retracted article within the text. Each mention was classified as follows: Positive and Negative citation. A positive citation indicates that the retracted article was cited as legitimate prior work and its findings used to support the author/s current study. A negative citation indicates that the authors mentioned the retracted article as such and its findings inappropriate. Thus, the study reveals that every citation to a retracted article is not necessarily in positive context, a negative citation will help other authors to become more cautious about using the citation in future and validate their study in more strong way by highlighting intentional or unintentional scientific fraud.

SCOPE

The scope of study is confined to top seven highly cited retracted articles as ranked by the Retraction Watch. These articles received altogether 1736 citations. However, analysis is based on 1097 citing papers as rests were in accessible as full text. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA 8, MLA 7, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Note: primary sources have slightly different requirements for citation. Please see these guidelines for more information.

Cited article

Context Analysis of Top Seven Retracted Articles: Should Retraction Watch Revisit the List?
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Help
Full screen
Items saved from this article
  • Highlights & Notes
  • Citations
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Style
    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA 8, MLA 7, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    Buy instant access to save your work.

    Already a member? Log in now.

    Search by... Author
    Show... All Results Primary Sources Peer-reviewed

    Oops!

    An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.