Can and Should Universal Injunctions Be Saved?

By Barnas, Szymon S. | Vanderbilt Law Review, October 2019 | Go to article overview

Can and Should Universal Injunctions Be Saved?


Barnas, Szymon S., Vanderbilt Law Review


Introduction

In April 2017, then-Attorney General Jeff Sessions expressed his amazement2 that "a judge sitting on an island in the Pacific" could stop President Donald Trump from fulfilling a key campaign promise: enacting a so-called Muslim Ban.3 Sessions was adding to the growing skepticism that a federal district court judge-sometimes handpicked based on his perceived outlier views4-could grant a "universal injunction"5 to immediately halt the enforcement of an executive action6 against not only the parties before the court but also against anyone, anywhere.7 When the final version of the Muslim Ban reached the Supreme Court in Trump v. Hawaii, Justice Clarence Thomas wrote separately to urge the Court to address the propriety of universal injunctions which he deemed "legally and historically dubious."8 Justice Neil Gorsuch also signaled his disapproval of these extraordinary remedies by sardonically referring to them as "cosmic injunctions" during oral argument.9 Chief Justice John Roberts previously voiced similar concerns.10

Even though the Supreme Court has yet to squarely address the propriety of universal injunctions,11 some lower courts have interpreted Trump v. International Refugee Assistance Project ("IRAP")12 as an endorsement of the remedy, citing the decision to justify their own universal injunctions.13 The Court in IRAP first recognized that "[c]rafting a preliminary injunction is an exercise of discretion and judgment, often dependent as much on the equities of a given case as the substance of the legal issues it presents."14 The Court then only slightly narrowed the district court's universal injunction against the Muslim Ban by leaving it in place for "foreign nationals who have a credible claim of a bona fide relationship with a person or entity in the United States."15 Nevertheless, the endorsement was tepid at best, and the Court's rebuke of universal injunctions could be impending.16

The growing scholarly consensus is that there should be a brightline rule against universal injunctions because historical limits on judicial power and the constitutional and structural constraints on federal courts prohibit equitable remedies from intentionally17 benefiting nonparties.18 The Department of Justice has advised federal prosecutors to oppose universal injunctions in every case.19 Furthermore, a member of Congress has introduced legislation that would create a brightline rule against the remedy.20 Some commentators and judges readily point to a different procedural mechanism when decrying universal injunctions: the Rule 23(b)(2) injunctive class action.21 They assert that if an individual plaintiff can secure broad injunctive relief that intentionally benefits nonparties, the 23(b)(2) class action is arguably superfluous.22

The rapid rise of universal injunctions has occurred simultaneously with the rise of sweeping public policy initiatives enacted through executive action.23 Universal injunctions halted a few of President Bush's executive actions and many of President Obama's.24 President Trump's policy agenda faced twenty-five universal injunctions in his first two years in office.25 But robust judicial review of the democratic branches of government that can secure systemwide relief is increasingly important in the face of growing, unchecked executive power26 and the erosion of the political process.27 If the universal injunction's demise is impending and the class action's demise continues unabated, obtaining systemwide relief may be difficult when such relief may be most needed.28

This Note proceeds in four parts. Part I summarizes the doctrinal basics of injunctive relief and class certification, then explains how courts have interpreted and applied these doctrines in ways that have caused the rapid rise of universal injunctions and the slow demise of class actions. Part II considers the tradeoffs litigants currently face when choosing whether to file a universal injunction suit or a class action suit by examining two challenges to President Trump's executive actions on asylum policy. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA 8, MLA 7, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Note: primary sources have slightly different requirements for citation. Please see these guidelines for more information.

Cited article

Can and Should Universal Injunctions Be Saved?
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Help
Full screen
Items saved from this article
  • Highlights & Notes
  • Citations
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Style
    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA 8, MLA 7, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    Buy instant access to save your work.

    Already a member? Log in now.

    Search by... Author
    Show... All Results Primary Sources Peer-reviewed

    Oops!

    An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.