Religion in Judicial Decision-Making: An Empirical Analysis

By Reyes, René; Reyes, Jessica W. | Brigham Young University Law Review, January 1, 2019 | Go to article overview

Religion in Judicial Decision-Making: An Empirical Analysis


Reyes, René, Reyes, Jessica W., Brigham Young University Law Review


(ProQuest: ... denotes formula omitted.)

Introduction

Empirical studies of judicial behavior are becoming increasingly common and sophisticated.1 These studies typically draw upon large databases of opinions and employ quantitative analytic techniques in an attempt to measure the influence of various factors in judicial decision-making.2 A focus of particular attention in many of these studies is the role played by political ideology. For example, cass sunstein and several colleagues examine this issue at length in a 2006 book aptly entitled Are Judges Political?3 Like many other scholars, Sunstein and his coauthors find that political ideology does indeed have an effect on judicial decisions - at least in some cases, and at least to some degree.4

Other empirical studies have concentrated their attention on the influence of ideology in specific doctrinal areas. Gregory Sisk and Michael Heise have published a series of articles focusing on religious liberty cases in the federal courts and have reported a range of results. while Sisk and Heise find that political ideology does not play a significant explanatory role in Free Exercise clause cases,5 they find that "[t]he powerful role of political factors . . . appears undeniable and substantial" in Establishment Clause cases.6 Similarly, in the context of education, Sisk and Heise conclude that "Republican-appointed judges were more likely than their Democratic-appointed counterparts to reach a pro-religion decision in school cases."7

There is thus a significant body of existing scholarly literature exploring the influence of ideology on judicial decision-making in general and on religion cases in particular. The present Article makes a novel contribution to that literature by exploring a related but distinct issue. Rather than analyzing religion as a category of cases that is subject to ideological influence, we focus on religion as a category of ideology that has the potential to exert its own influence.

Several key elements distinguish our approach. First, we seek to measure the role of religion in a broad range of cases in which various forms of ideological influence might be expected to manifest themselves. In other words, we do not limit our examination of religious influence to cases that present religious liberty issues. Second, whereas some studies have included religion among other variables when examining the role of political ideology in decision-making,8 our emphasis is on the role of religion as such. We accordingly offer a much more detailed discussion of the relationship between religious identification and outcomes, and the ways in which this relationship may differ with respect to various religious denominations and traditions. Third, rather than looking at the independent effects of different ideological influences, we employ more complex econometric techniques to understand how political ideology measured several different ways may interact with religious ideology in influencing voting behavior in specific types of cases. We therefore offer more textured results of the complex relationships among political ideology, religious identification, and different substantive areas of the law. We are able to say more not only about the interactions between political ideology and religion but about how they operate differently in different substantive contexts, such as cases in which fundamental moral values are at issue. Finally, while most previous studies have employed comparison of means or regression with only main effects, we marshal more sophisticated econometric and visual methodologies to analyze and understand the empirical patterns in the data. we are therefore able to provide more nuanced and (hopefully) more transparent insight into the nature of the effects of political ideology and religion on voting behavior of judges.

The Article is organized as follows. Part i discusses the motivation for studying the influence of religion on judicial decision-making. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA 8, MLA 7, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Note: primary sources have slightly different requirements for citation. Please see these guidelines for more information.

Cited article

Religion in Judicial Decision-Making: An Empirical Analysis
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Help
Full screen
Items saved from this article
  • Highlights & Notes
  • Citations
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Style
    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA 8, MLA 7, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    Buy instant access to save your work.

    Already a member? Log in now.

    Search by... Author
    Show... All Results Primary Sources Peer-reviewed

    Oops!

    An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.