The G Factor: The Science of Mental Ability

By Arthur R. Jensen | Go to book overview

differences that enters into many aspects of human behavior besides those narrowly conceived of as scholastic or intellectual.


NOTES
1.
Jensen, 1980a (Chapter 8); Jensen, 1993a. The most detailed and advanced treatments of validity are by Cronbach ( 1971) and Messick ( 1989).
2.
Another way of conceptualizing the meaning of a validity coefficient (rxc) is in terms of the following formula: rxc = (T - R) / (P - R), where T is the average level of performance on the criterion for persons selected with the test, R is the mean level of criterion performance for persons selected at random, and P is the mean criterion performance for perfectly selected persons, as if rxc = 1. Hence rxc is a direct measure of the proportional gain in the mean criterion performance that results from the use of the test for selection as compared to what the mean level of criterion performance would be with random selection. In other words, the validity coefficient is a direct indicator of the effectiveness of the test's predictive accuracy, such that, for example, a validity coefficient of .50 provides just half as accurate prediction as a validity coefficient of 1.00, which indicates perfect prediction. Even a quite modest validity coefficient has considerable practical value when a great many binary (i.e., yes- no, pass-fail, win-lose) decisions are made. For example, the casino at Monte Carlo reaps large sums of money every day from its roulette games, because of course the house always has better odds for not losing than the gamblers have for winning, yet the house advantage is, in fact, equivalent to a predictive validity coefficient of only +.027! The practical value of a validity coefficient of +.27, therefore, is certainly not of negligible value where a large number of selection decisions must be made.
3.
The standard error of estimate (SEest) is related to the validity coefficient (rxc) as follows: SEest = sc (1 - rxc2)½, where sc is the standard deviation of the criterion measure. The ratio SEest/sc measures the proportional error of predicting individuals' point values on the criterion. The percentage gain in accuracy of point predictions as compared with purely random selection is equal to 100(1 - SEest/sc), which is termed the index of forecasting efficiency. The use of this index is now in disfavor when the overall value of test-based selection is being considered, because the index of forecasting efficiency is not directly related to the overall mean gain in criterion performance afforded by test- based selection. The validity coefficient itself, however, is a direct indicator of the proportional gain in mean criterion performance of individuals who were selected by means of a test with a certain validity coefficient (see Note 2). The common habit of squaring the validity coefficient to obtain the proportion of variance in the criterion accounted for by the linear regression of criterion measures on test scores, although not statistically incorrect, is an uninformative and misleading way of interpreting a validity coefficient for any practical purpose.
4.
There are several types, definitions, and statistical criteria of test bias. For a comprehensive discussion, see Jensen, 1980a, Chapter 9.
5.
Some psychologists distinguish between two types of knowledge: declarative knowledge, which is knowing about something (e.g., Fe stands for iron in the periodic table of elements; Plato wrote The Republic; yeast is used in making bread), and procedural knowledge, which is knowing how to go about doing something (e.g., trouble-

-301-

Notes for this page

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this book

This book has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this book

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this page

Cited page

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited page

Bookmark this page
The G Factor: The Science of Mental Ability
Table of contents

Table of contents

  • Title Page iii
  • Contents vii
  • Preface ix
  • Acknowledgments xiii
  • Chapter 2 - The Discovery of G 18
  • Notes 39
  • Chapter 3 - The Trouble with "Intelligence" 45
  • Notes 68
  • Chapter 4 - Models and Characteristics of G 95
  • Chapter 5 - Challenges to G 105
  • Notes 133
  • Chapter 6 - Biological Correlates of G 137
  • Notes 165
  • Chapter 7 - The Heritability of G 169
  • Notes 197
  • Chapter 8 - Information Processing and G 203
  • Notes 261
  • Chapter 9 - The Practical Validity of G 270
  • Notes 301
  • Chapter 10 - Construct, Vehicles, and Measurements 306
  • Notes 344
  • Chapter 11 - Population Differences in G 350
  • Notes 402
  • Chapter 12 - Population Differences in G: Causal Hypotheses 418
  • Notes 516
  • Chapter 13 - Sex Differences in G 531
  • Notes 542
  • Chapter 14 - The G Nexus 544
  • Notes 579
  • Appendix A - Spearman's "Law of Diminishing Returns" 585
  • Appendix B - Method of Correlated Vectors 589
  • Appendix C - Multivariate Analyses of a Nexus 593
  • References 597
  • Name Index 635
  • Subject Index 643
  • About the Author 649
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this book

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Help
Full screen
/ 652

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Style
    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    Buy instant access to save your work.

    Already a member? Log in now.

    Author Advanced search

    Oops!

    An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.