the major frameworks of gender: essentialist, socialization, social constructionist, and structural theories ( Fish, 1999), which provide lenses for further research. There are probably many more. Accordingly, there is much more research that can be done and is being done to augment and extend the knowledge of the value of the mythopoetic perspective of men's healing work.
In today's world of managed care and brief therapy, it would seem that any therapist and others in the healing professions would seem to be ethically bound to recommend additional resources for their male friends and clients. These resources could be from an array of mythopoetic support groups, weekend events, initiatory events, and other mythopoetic perspective events. The research reported in this book strongly indicates that mythopoetic perspective activities are helpful in the healing process and can be a successful adjunct to therapy in the healing of men's (and women's and children's) lives.
Bronfenbrenner U. ( 1979). The ecology of human development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Cornish P. A. ( 1999). "Men engaging feminism: A model of personal change and social transformation". Journal of Men's Studies, 7, 173-199.
Fish R. ( 1999). The mythopoetic men's movement and the shaping of masculine identification. Paper presented at the 7th American Men's Studies Association Conference, Vanderbilt University Divinity School, Nashville, TN.
Lerner R. M. ( 1989). "Developmental contextualism and the life-span view of person- context interaction". In M. Bornstein & J. Brunner (Eds.), Interactions in human development. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Lorentzen J. ( 1998). Book review of The politics of manhood, edited by Michael Kimmel . Men and Masculinities, 1, 112-115.
Lynd S. ( 1999). "Feminism for men". Journal of Men's Studies, 7, 165-172.
Steinem G. ( 1993). Revolution from within: A book of self-esteem. Boston: Little, Brown.