suggest that the strength of visually mediated food avoidance learning may depend on the number of available discriminative cues. Ecologically, such findings are consistent with the observation that the use of multiple aposematic cues may confer greater protection from predators than the use of simple cues, such as color, alone.
Alcock J. ( 1969a). "Observational learning by fork-tailed flycatchers (Muscivora tyrannus)". Animal Behavior, 17, 652-657.
Alcock J. ( 1970). "Punishment levels and the response of black capped chickadees (Parus atricapillus) to three kinds of artificial seeds". Animal Behavior, 18, 592-599.
Avery M. L. ( 1985). "Application of mimicry theory to bird damage control". Journal Wildlife Management, 49, 1116-1121.
Cott H. B. ( 1940). Adaptive coloration in animals. London: Methuen.
Czaplicki J. A., Borrebach D. E., & Wilcoxin H. C. ( 1976). "Stimulus generalization of an illness-induced aversion to different intensities of colored water in Japanese Quail". Animal Learning Behavior, 4, 45-48.
Greig-Smith P. W., & Rowney C. M. (in press). "Effects of colour on the aversions of starlings and house sparrows to five chemical repellents". Crop Protection.
Mason R., Adams M. A., & Clark L. ( 1987). The repellency of anthranilate derivatives to starlings (Sturnus vulgaris): Chemical correlates and sensory mediation. Manuscript submitted for publication.
Mason J. R., Arzt A. H., & Reidinger R. F. ( 1984a). "Comparative assessment of food preferences and aversions acquired by observational learning". Auk, 101, 796-803.
Mason J. R., Arzt A. H., & Reidinger R. F. ( 1984b). "Evaluation of dimethyl anthranilate as a non-toxic bird repellent for feedlot settings". In J. Caslick (Ed.), Proceedings of the First Eastern Animal Damage Control Conference (pp. 259-263). Ithica, NY: Cornell University Press.