dominance and Group B sensitivity and tolerance, if not submission, all this regardless of gender considerations, the socialization model would reasonably well predict these groups' behavior in response to horror -- if A and B were substituted for boys and girls or men and women.
Returning to gender socialization, it also should be clear that personality assessments other than psychological gender are potentially useful in refining the model. Traits of interest (e.g., extroversion-introversion, psychoticism, neuroticism, empathy, sensation-seeking) vary greatly within gender and have been shown to mediate emotional reactions to cinematic horror ( Edwards, 1991; Tamborini, 1991; Weaver, 1991; Zuckerman & Litle, 1986). Variance in pertinent traits presumably does not only influence interest in, and enjoyment of, cinematic horror, but probably modifies social effects as well.
Finally, it must be reiterated that the analysis of the contribution of social factors to the enjoyment of cinematic horror does not lay claim to offering a complete account of the enjoyment of horror. Numerous alternative factors are likely to contribute their part. A prime candidate is the distress-delight conversion predicted by suspense theory ( Zillmann, 1980, 1991). The more distress is experienced, the greater the euphoric reaction on its resolution ( Sparks, 1991). Cinematic horror offers the needed conditions for such transformation with considerable frequency, but numerous other contributing factors may exist, awaiting discovery.
Abrams D., & Hogg M. A. (Eds.). ( 1990). Social identity theory: Constructive and critical advances. New York: Springer-Verlag.
Alle haben gekotzt, nur ich nicht [All threw up, but not me]. ( 1984, March 12). Der Spiegel, p. 42.
Armbruster B., & Kuchler H.-D. ( 1984). "Die Klasse von 1984: Videobewaeltigung in der Schule? -- Eine Tagung mit Lehrern". Medien Praktisch, 2,4-9.
Averill J. R. ( 1982). Anger and aggression: An essay on emotion. New York: Springer-Verlag.
Bandura A. ( 1969). Principles of behavior modification. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
Bandura A. ( 1971). "Analysis of modeling". In A. Bandura (Ed.), Psychological modeling: Conflicting theories (pp. 1-62). Chicago: Aldine-Atherton.
Barry H., Bacon M. K., & Child I. L. ( 1957). "A cross-cultural survey of some sex differences in socialization". Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 55,327-332.
Bem S. L. ( 1976). "Probing the promise of androgyny". In A. G. Kaplan & J. P. Bean (Eds.), Beyond sex-role stereotypes: Readings toward a psychology of androgyny (pp. 48-62). Boston: Little, Brown.
Bem S. L. ( 1985). "Androgyny and gender schema theory: A conceptual and empirical investigation". In T. B. Sonderegger (Ed.), Nebraska Symposium on Motivation: Psychology and gender (pp. 176-226). Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.
Blier M. J., & Blier-Wilson L. A. ( 1989). "Gender differences in self-rated emotional expressiveness". Sex Roles, 21( 3-4), 287-295.
Brody L. R. ( 1985). "Gender differences in emotional development: A review of theories and research". Journal of Personality, 53( 2), 102-149.
Brosius H.-B., & Hartmann T. ( 1988). "Erfahrungen mit Horror-Videos bei Schülern unterschiedlicher Schultypen". Eine Umfrage unter 12 his 15jährigen Schlüern [Experience with horror videos of students from different types of schools: A survey of students aged 12-15]. Communications, 14( 3),