Intergroup Relations

By Walter G. Stephan; Cookie White Stephan | Go to book overview

Because experiential programs have been shown to have some advantages over other training techniques, they have been recommended as additions to fact-based and attribution-based programs ( Bhawuk, 1990; Brislin et al., 1983; Gudykunst & Hammer, 1983). The primary advantage of these programs is that active training is more involving and realistic than passive training. In addition, trainees receive experience in problem solving, and they have the opportunity to test their capabilities. As a result, they have the opportunity to drop out if they feel they cannot handle the intercultural context. Not surprisingly, high-involvement programs tend to provide more valuable and realistic training than low-involvement programs. Because high-involvement programs are also labor, cost, and time intensive, it is not always feasible to use them. However, experts in intercultural training recommend that experiential involvement be as high as possible.


Culture-General Versus Culture-Specific Training

Training programs can be either culture general, designed to promote adaptation and effective functioning in any culture, or culture specific, designed to help individuals adapt to a specific culture ( Brislin U+00-26 Pedersen, 1976). The fact-based training programs described earlier and almost all the cultural assimilators are culture specific; most of the experiential exercises described earlier are culture general. Cultural self-awareness training provides another example of culture- general training ( Kraemer, 1974). The goal of self-awareness training is to make individuals more aware of their own culture and thus their culturally learned assumptions. It is assumed that individuals' cultural judgments are nonconscious; they cannot be suspended until individuals have been made aware of their judgments. This awareness is accomplished by identifying one's own culture's values and assumptions, which are displayed in videotaped sequences showing an American engaged in conversation with an individual from a non-Western culture.

Which type of training results in the most effective intercultural interactions? Not surprisingly, each type of program has advantages and disadvantages. Culture-general training programs are superior in making individuals more aware of their own cultural assumptions, but they do not necessarily increase the individuals' ability to respond effectively in another culture. Culture-specific programs are better at teaching effective communication within a specific culture, but the learning may not point up trainee's ethnocentric tendencies ( Rhuly,

-138-

Notes for this page

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this book

This book has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this book

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this page

Cited page

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited page

Bookmark this page
Intergroup Relations
Table of contents

Table of contents

  • Title Page iii
  • Contents v
  • Preface ix
  • Chapter - 1 Stereotypes 1
  • Summary 30
  • Chapter - 2 Theories of Prejudice 33
  • Chapter - 3 The Contact Hypothesis in Intergroup Relations 61
  • Summary 86
  • Chapter - 4 Social Identity, Self-Categorization, and Intergroup Attitudes 89
  • Summary 111
  • Chapter - 5 Intercultural Relations 115
  • Summary 138
  • Chapter - 6 Intergroup Conflict and Its Resolution 141
  • Summary 169
  • References 173
  • Index 211
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this book

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Help
Full screen
/ 228

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Style
    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    Buy instant access to save your work.

    Already a member? Log in now.

    Oops!

    An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.