Identity Politics, Institutional Response, and Cultural Negotiation: Meanings of a Gay and Lesbian Office on Campus
If coming out says, "We're queer, we're here, get used to it," new-right identity appropriates this to say, "We knew it," and to society, "We told you so." What operates as a performative act of identity assertion for "queers" is read by the new right as descriptive, as not performative at all.
-- Cindy Patton, 1993, 145-46
I think that most of those responses [the creation of a gay and lesbian support office] are sort of token responses and not really substantive responses. I think this university in general is very good at constructing messages that are, for lack of a better term, sort of politically correct without really getting at the roots of most of the problems. . . . But the university is smart enough as an institution, and the leadership is smart enough to know that in the world of academia, it's very important to make those symbolic gestures. In terms of the national reputation of the school, in terms of being able to recruit faculty, staff, and students, and all those kinds of things. You know, it means that they're not completely clueless, it means that the school subscribes to basic sort of liberal values. Again, in comparison to the backlash at a lot of universities and colleges, that's certainly a positive. -- A Liberal U faculty member
The advent of campus activism in the form of identity politics throughout the 1970s and 1980s encouraged the institutionalization of such interdisciplinary courses and programs as Women's and African American Studies, hiring and admissions practices that included "minorities," and the creation of centers and campus programming related to "diversity." In the context of post-Civil Rights and post-Stonewall social movements, the