The New Deal and Its Legacy: Critique and Reappraisal

By Robert Eden | Go to book overview

Preface

Early in the spring of 1985, the Department of History and Political Science of Hillsdale College, in conjunction with the Center for Constructive Alternatives, published an invitation for paper proposals in several scholarly journals. The original invitation may serve as a measure by which to judge the current volume:

November 1986 will mark the fiftieth anniversary of Franklin Roosevelt's election to a second term as President of the United States. To many students of American politics, this election represents a critical moment in a critical phase of our history, the moment when the American people in effect ratified the leadership of an administration which advanced a new interpretation of traditional American ideals. Already in 1932, Roosevelt had called for "a reappraisal of values" or a "redefinition in terms of a changing and growing social order" of the rights proclaimed in the Declaration of Independence; in 1936, America seemed to answer this call.

To what degree Roosevelt's reappraisal of the American political tradition forms the basis of contemporary American politics is a difficult question; to address it adequately one must first ask whether the bewildering complex of policies we associate with the New Deal indeed rested on any coherent philosophy. In any case, the discontinuities between the New Deal and later versions of liberalism often seem at least as impressive as the continuities. Indeed, such discontinuities led many observers, beginning in the 1960s, to point to signs of decay in the public philosophy of the New Deal and of the political order associated with it, and to anticipate the emergence of a new alignment of parties and interests and of a new interpretation of the character and purpose of American democracy.

The question whether such a realignment is now in progress is an open one. Although the Republicans have improved their position considerably under Reagan's leadership, it is far from clear that they have laid the foundations for long-term dominance or that they have clearly defined their position with respect to the legacy of the New Deal. (Is Reagan a "New Deal conservative," as Samuel H. Beer has argued?) As for the Democrats, the disarray of their party is not a hypothesis of political scientists but a fact openly avowed

-ix-

Notes for this page

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this book

This book has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this book

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this page

Cited page

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited page

Bookmark this page
The New Deal and Its Legacy: Critique and Reappraisal
Table of contents

Table of contents

Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this book

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Help
Full screen
/ 268

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Style
    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    Buy instant access to save your work.

    Already a member? Log in now.

    Author Advanced search

    Oops!

    An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.