messages, the uncertain nature of events, and unsureness as to the content or purpose of the talk are four features of situations that lead individuals to respond equivocally. It is also likely that individuals may sometimes evade questions for personal gains that may involve a cost to others. The research presented in this chapter suggests though that many equivocal messages that occur in day-to-day interactions are attempts to avoid difficulties and unsuccessful communication that might arise from direct messages. Nonetheless, there may be some readers who remain convinced that equivocation is something undesirable. We suggest to these readers that before they judge an equivocal message as poor communication, they take a closer look at the purpose behind the question asked, the consequences a direct message would have for the interactants, and whether they are prepared to give an unpleasant but direct truth to someone about whom they care deeply.
Angrosino M. V. ( 1989). Documents of interaction: Biography, autobiography, and life history in social science perspective. Gainsville: University of Florida.
Aristotle. ( 1952). "Rhetoric". In Britannica great books (Vol. 9), W. R. Roberts (Trans.), Chicago: Encyclopedia Britannica.
Bateson G., Jackson D. D., Haley J., & Weakland J. ( 1956). "Toward a theory of schizophrenia". Behavioral Science, 1, 251-264.
Bavelas J. B. ( 1983). "Situations that lead to disqualification". Human Communication Research, 9, 130-145.
Bavelas J. B. ( 1985). "A situational theory of disqualification: Using language to leave the field." In J. P. Forgas (Ed.), Language and social situations (pp. 189-211). New York: Springer-Verlag.
Bavelas J. B., & Chovil N. ( 1986). "How people disqualify: Experimental studies of spontaneous written disqualification". Communication Monographs, 53, 70-74.
Bavelas J. B., Black A., Bryson L., & Mullett J. ( 1988). "Political equivocation: A situational explanation". Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 7, 137-145.
Bavelas J. B., Black A., Chovil N., & Mullett J. ( 1990a). Equivocal communication. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Bavelas J. B., Black A., Chovil N., & Mullett J. ( 1990b). "Truths, lies, and equivocations: The effect of conflicting goals on discourse". Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 9, 135-161.
Bavelas J. B., & Smith B. J. ( 1982). "A method for scaling verbal disqualification". Human Communication Research 8, 214-227.
Bowers J. W., Elliott N. D., & Desmond R. J. ( 1977). "Exploiting pragmatic rules: Devious messages". Human Communication Research, 3, 235-242.
Brown P., & Levinson S. ( 1978). "Universals in language usage". In E. N. Goody (Ed.), Questions and politeness: Strategies in social interaction (pp. 56-289). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Camden C., Motley M. T., & Wilson A. ( 1984). "White lies in interpersonal communication: A taxonomy and preliminary investigation of social motivations". Western Journal of Speech Communication, 48, 309-325.
Cissna K. N. L., & Sieburg E. ( 1981). "Patterns of interactional confirmation and disconfirmation".In C. Wilder-Mott & J. H. Weakland (Eds.), Rigor and imagination: Essays from the legacy of Gregory Bateson (pp. 253-282). New York: Praeger.