Animal Cognition: Proceedings of the Harry Frank Guggenheim Conference, June 2-4, 1982

By H. S. Terrace; H. L. Roitblat et al. | Go to book overview

know of none using a serial probe recognition procedure. One recall experiment ( Postman & Riley, 1959) is distinctive in that it used a serial learning procedure from which serial position functions were obtained. They showed a rebound of the primacy effect much as we have shown here. Most of the studies used a paired-associate design from which serial position functions are not usually obtained.

We feel compelled to make some mention of the role of rehearsal before leaving this discussion of the probe-delay effects, because rehearsal is currently thought to be responsible for the primacy effect ( Waugh & Norman, 1965; Atkinson & Shiffrin, 1968). Longer probe delays provide more opportunity for rehearsal, but rehearsal during the probe delay probably cannot account for rebound of the primacy effect. Consider the following: If the subjects can retrieve the items in order to rehearse them, then why can't this same retrieval be instrumental in the correct choice response at short as well as long delays? Indeed, if rehearsal functions to bridge the delay, then primacy effect should be better at short than long delays because of occasional rehearsal failures.


V. CONCLUDING REMARKS

Pigeons acquired serial probe recognition performance with list lengths as long as four items and exhibited primacy as well as recency effects in their serial position functions. The primacy effect figures prominently in many memory theories, and from a comparative memory stand-point it is important that pigeons, like humans and monkeys, exhibited this effect Pigeons have difficulty performing with variable list lengths and so unless this difficulty can be overcome, their memory-scanning processes cannot be tested and compared to monkeys and humans. Unlike monkeys, however, they do not readily develop short-cuts to the memory task and, for example, memorize the correct responses to the probe items.

Monkeys (and humans too) when given the opportunity, memorize the correct responses to probe items and thereby short-circuit the memory process of comparing the probe item to their memory of the list items. In order to thwart their probe memorization strategy, items were changed on a regular basis before they had a chance to memorize them. The "U" shaped serial position functions and the systematic changes in the serial position function with probe delay demonstrated that all three species were making a memory comparison.

The probe-delay effects reflect what may be an important mechanism of memory processing generally: an absence of a primacy effect at short probe delays, its emergence at intermediate delays, its dominance of the serial position function at long probe delays. These probe-delay effects are demonstrated and reported here for three different organisms: humans, monkeys and pigeons. These results may be important for the human memory literature from the standpoint of development of the primacy effect and may support interference theory and the release from RI. Such results, dealing with the subtle and fine-grained inner workings of the memory system, have heretofore been confined to human memory research. It is of paramount importance that these results have been

-370-

Notes for this page

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this book

This book has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this book

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this page

Cited page

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited page

Bookmark this page
Animal Cognition: Proceedings of the Harry Frank Guggenheim Conference, June 2-4, 1982
Table of contents

Table of contents

Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this book

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Help
Full screen
/ 684

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Style
    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    Buy instant access to save your work.

    Already a member? Log in now.

    Author Advanced search

    Oops!

    An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.