Abuse of Process and Judicial Stays of Criminal Proceedings

By Andrew L.-T. Choo | Go to book overview

Preface

THE judicial discretion to stay criminal proceedings has attracted considerable attention in recent times. In 1964 the House of Lords confirmed the ability of a criminal court to stay proceedings which are an abuse of the process of the court. Since then, the number of reported cases on the abuse of process discretion in criminal litigation has increased dramatically. Ho,wever, these are, in the main, decisions of Queen's Bench Divisional Courts, and most of the decisions are concerned with the single issue of the extent to which proceedings may be stayed on account of police or prosecutorial delay. The fact that very few cases on the abuse of process discretion in criminal litigation reach the Court of Appeal or House of Tords means that there has been relatively little theoretical discussion of the topic by the highest courts in the jurisdiction. Nevertheless, much interest is being shown in the topic by academic commentators, as evidenced by the rapidly growing number of journal articles and commentaries being published. To date, however, nobody in England has produced a full-length monograph on the judicial discretion to stay criminal proceedings as an abuse of process.

The chief concern of this book is to provide answers to two important, and closely related, questions which remain unresolved. First, on precisely what basis, or bases, should the judicial discretion to stay criminal proceedings be exercised? Secondly, what is the scope of the discretion? For example, it is clear that, in England, the discretion may be exercised in 'double-jeopardy' situations and in cases where there has been delay in bringing the defendant to trial. However, it appears that the discretion is not exercisable in England in cases where the defendant has been brought to trial as a result of an 'illegal extradition', or in cases of entrapment. By contrast, in certain other Commonwealth jurisdictions the discretion has been held to be exercisable in all of the above situations. Obviously, widely differing views on the scope of the discretion exist, and we shall see that the reasons for this difference of opinion provide an important clue to an understanding of the topic.

The present work presents a fresh perspective on the abuse of process discretion by setting the discretion against the general backdrop of the law of criminal evidence. In recent times, a number of evidence scholars have demonstrated persuasively that every exclusionary rule and exclusionary discretion in the law of criminal evidence can be explained by reference to the protection of the innocent from wrongful conviction and/or the protection of the moral integrity of the criminal process. I seek to

-ix-

Notes for this page

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this book

This book has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this book

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this page

Cited page

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited page

Bookmark this page
Abuse of Process and Judicial Stays of Criminal Proceedings
Table of contents

Table of contents

  • Title Page iii
  • General Editor's Introduction vii
  • Preface ix
  • Addendum xi
  • Contents xiii
  • Table of Cases xv
  • Table of Statutory Material xxix
  • 1 - The Abuse of Process Discretion and Criminal Justice 1
  • 2 - Prosecutorial Manipulation or Misuse of Process 16
  • 3 - Delay 47
  • 4 - Police Impropriety at the Investigatory Stage 78
  • 5 - Procedural Issues 119
  • 6 - Entrapment 148
  • 7 - Conclusion: Rationalization and Reform 182
  • Bibliography 188
  • Index 205
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this book

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Help
Full screen
/ 207

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Style
    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    Buy instant access to save your work.

    Already a member? Log in now.

    Author Advanced search

    Oops!

    An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.